BORIS Johnson has faced fierce criticism from senior Tory MPs as Westminster was recalled for an emergency debate on the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban.
Tobias Ellwood, a Conservative MP who chairs the Defence Committee, accused the Prime Minister of lacking “backbone” and claimed that enough Tory backbenchers would vote against the government that it would be likely to lose any vote on the issue.
Ellwood, a former Army officer who lost his brother to terrorism in 2002, accused an increasingly “isolationist” government of being “complicit in allowing another dictatorship to form”.
In a packed Commons chamber unseen since before the pandemic, the Prime Minister defended the final pull-out of British troops, saying it was an “illusion” to think the international military mission could have continued without US forces.
But he faced cries of disbelief when he denied the Government had been unprepared for the lightning takeover by the Taliban which saw the Western-backed government of President Ashraf Ghani collapse in just days.
Johnson was faced with further disbelief from Tory backbenchers just minutes into the debate when he claimed “most of the key questions have already been extensively gone into”.
READ MORE: WATCH: SNP MPs fume after Tory's 'nonsense' claim about refugees in Scotland
In a series of highly charged interventions, he was accused by senior Conservatives of presiding over an “operational and strategic blunder” which would weaken the West in the eyes of its adversaries.
Former prime minister Theresa May said it was “a major setback for British foreign policy” nearly 20 years after UK forces first entered the country in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks on the US.
In an emotional speech which drew rare applause from some MPs, Tory MP Tom Tugendhat – who served as an Army officer in Afghanistan – said the UK and its Western allies had received a “very harsh lesson”.
“This doesn’t need to be defeat but at the moment it damn well feels like it,” he said.
Johnson said ministers had considered the possible options when the US announced its intention to withdraw, but they came up against the “hard reality” that there was no will among allies to continue without the Americans.
Tobias Ellwood MP looked on in disbelief as Boris Johnson claimed the majority of the key questions had already been addressed
Deploying “tens of thousands” of British troops to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban was not, he said, “an option that would commend itself either to the British people or to this House”.
“The West could not continue this US-led mission, a mission conceived and executed in support of America, without American logistics, without US air power and without American might,” the Prime Minister said.
“I really think that it is an illusion to believe that there is appetite amongst any of our partners for a continued military presence or for a military solution imposed by Nato in Afghanistan. That idea ended with the combat mission in 2014.”
READ MORE: 'You're trying to wind me up': Ian Blackford in Commons clash with Dominic Raab
Johnson said planning had been under way for “many months” for the US withdrawal – which precipitated the collapse of the Government – and that a decision to commission an emergency handling centre at Kabul airport was taken two weeks ago.
He said the UK was doubling humanitarian aid to Afghanistan to £260 million while the immediate priority was to evacuate the remaining UK nationals and those Afghans who had worked with the British in the country.
However, May said she found it “incomprehensible and worrying” that the UK had been unable to put together an alternative alliance to sustain the Afghan government.
She accused Johnson of hoping “on a wing and a prayer it’d be alright on the night”.
“We boast about global Britain, but where is global Britain on the streets of Kabul? A successful foreign policy strategy will be judged by our deeds, not by our words,” she said.
“Russia will not be blind to the implications of this withdrawal decision and the manner in which it has been taken.
“Neither will China and others have failed to notice the implications because in recent years the West has appeared to be less willing to defend its values.”
READ MORE: WATCH: Alyn Smith blames UK Government over Afghan refugees
Ellwood, the Defence Committee chair, said the collapse of Afghanistan was the result of “an operational and strategic blunder”.
“What we require is the backbone, the courage, the leadership to step forward, yet when our moment comes such as this we are found wanting,” he said.
“We are complicit in allowing another dictatorship to form as we become more isolationist.”
He added: “I’m sorry there’s no vote here today, as I believe the government would not have the support of the house.”
Tugendhat, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said the criticisms by US President Joe Biden of the Afghan forces had been “shameful”.
“Those who have not fought for the colours they fly should be careful about criticising those who have,” he said.
Labour leader Keir Starmer said there had been a “failure of preparation” by the Government for which Johnson bore a “heavy responsibility”.
He said the Prime Minister was in a position to give a lead on the international stage but had failed to do so.
“The desperate situation requires leadership and for the Prime Minister to snap out of his complacency,” he said.
“We do not turn our backs on friends at their time of need. We owe an obligation to the people of Afghanistan.”
READ MORE: Will those in Afghanistan be helped by the recall of the UK Parliament?
Johnson said the Government had so far secured the safe return of 306 UK nationals and 2052 Afghans, with a further 2000 Afghan applications completed and many more being processed.
He acknowledged the sacrifice of the British forces who had served in the country since 2001, and said he was committed to working with allies to ensure it did not again become a centre of international terrorism.
“Even amid the heart-wrenching scenes we see today, I believe they should be proud of their achievements and we should be deeply proud of them,” he said.
“They gave their all for our safety and we owe it to them to give our all to prevent Afghanistan from once again becoming a breeding ground for terrorism.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel