ONE of the oil and gas sector’s most respected figures has said it would be “absolutely crazy” for the UK to stop drilling for oil.
And Sir Ian Wood has claimed there would be a significant economic impact on the north east of Scotland if oil and gas production ended earlier than planned – including the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.
The tycoon, who has previously voiced opposition to a second independence referendum, said: “Right now there's 71,000 jobs in oil and gas in Scotland. And if they went out there quickly then these jobs would go.
“Not only that, we'd have a massive balance of payments issue as well.
“It does not make sense from any point of view. You're better from the economic point of view, from the environment point of view, from the jobs point of view, to carry on the path we're on.”
In a BBC Scotland interview, Wood said it would be “detrimental, environmentally” to shut down the oil and gas sector, and new fields were necessary to stop imports from countries with less strict regulations.
“If we don't have our own oil and gas we'll have to import it because we just don't have any other resources,” he said.
“And if we import it we'll have more potent gas and we'll do more damage to the environment – it would be, frankly, absolutely crazy. It would be detrimental, environmentally.”
However, Mel Evans, from Greenpeace, said Wood’s comments were “a load of rubbish”.
She said: “New oil would be disastrous for the climate. Looking at our own oil production, the UK has an abysmal track record on operational emissions – we’re decades behind Norway.
“And we already export 80% of oil produced in the UK, so claiming that new oil is needed for our own supply is misleading.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel