A MOTION has been lodged in the Scottish Parliament accusing the BBC of acting to protect Douglas Ross from “valid criticism” by removing a part of a quote he gave which was criticised as being a “homophobic dog-whistle”.
The Tory leader had branded the SNP-Green deal “anti-families” on the day it was announced, a criticism which was widely derided as not being “fit for Scottish politics in the 21st century”.
SNP MSP Karen Adam, who was raised in a same-sex household, called on Ross to “break down” exactly what he meant by the remark, which has historically been used to argue against LGBT rights.
READ MORE: SNP MSP launches blistering takedown of Douglas Ross 'anti-families' comment
However, The National revealed that in the BBC’s report on the SNP-Green deal, which included Ross’s comments, the anti-family line was omitted.
Instead, the corporation paraphrased the Scots Tory, telling readers he had said the deal “would punish hardworking families”.
Now, SNP MSP James Dornan (above) has lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament accusing the BBC of protecting Ross from “valid criticism” by editing his statement.
Motion S6M-00940, lodged on August 30, asks MSPs to recognise:
“That the Parliament is disappointed with the BBC editing of a statement made by Douglas Ross, via Twitter, regarding the cooperation agreement between the Scottish National Party and Scottish Green Party, in which he used the term, ‘anti-families’; considers that this phrase is often used to vilify pro-LGBTQI+ policies; understands that, when reporting on the statement, the BBC removed this term, which it believes protected Douglas Ross from what it sees as valid criticism; reminds the BBC of what it sees as its responsibility to report fairly and accurately, and requests that, in future, the broadcaster provides full context when quoting politicians and political parties’ statements.”
A BBC spokesperson previously told The National that their website's article had "reflected Mr Ross's main criticisms".
The Scottish Tories have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel