MORE than eight out of 10 Scots would support the introduction of a four-day working week, a new poll has found.
Research for the think tank IPPR Scotland found that 80% of people believed that cutting their number of days at work – with no loss of pay – would have a "positive effect on their wellbeing".
As well as finding that more than 80% would back such a change, the survey found that 88% would be willing to take part in trial schemes being set up by ministers at Holyrood.
Pilots are being staged in the wake of changes in working practices brought about by the coronavirus pandemic, with the SNP having pledged a £10 million fund for companies trialling a four-day week.
But IPPR Scotland said the Scottish Government should expand such schemes to include more sectors of the economy, people working in non-office-based jobs, those who do shift work and part-time employees.
The think tank argued that unless lower-paid sectors were included in the pilot, along with those who may find making the shift to a four-day week more difficult, the trial schemes may not properly test the impact of such a switch.
However, the poll – for which about 2203 people aged between 16 and 65 were questioned – also found that almost two-thirds (65%) believe a shorter working week could boost Scotland's productivity.
Rachel Statham, senior research fellow at IPPR Scotland, said: "The Scottish Government is right to be trialling a four-day working week because today's evidence shows that it is a policy with overwhelming public support, and could be a positive step towards building an economy hardwired for wellbeing.
"But any successful transition post-Covid-19 must include all kinds of workplaces, and all types of work. The full-time, nine-to-five office job is not how many people across Scotland work - and shorter working time trials need to reflect that reality.
"So we must examine what shorter working time looks like from the perspective of shift workers, those working excessive hours to make ends meet, or those who currently have fewer hours than they would like to have."
A Scottish Government spokesman added: "The pandemic has served to intensify interest in and support for more flexible working practices, which could include a shift to a four-day working week.
"Reductions in the working week might help sustain more and better jobs, and enhance wellbeing.
"We are in the early stages of designing a £10 million pilot that will help companies explore the benefits and costs of moving to a four-day working week. The pilot will allow us to develop a better understanding of the implications of a broader shift to a shorter working week across the economy."
Roz Foyer, Scottish Trades Union Congress general secretary, said: "Moving workers to a four-day week, without loss of pay, would bring a wide range of benefits.
"We welcome the recommendation that the Scottish Government should expand its four-day week pilot to include more sectors, including non-office-based jobs and those who work different shifts.
"A four-day week should be for everyone, and research into it should take into account workers other than nine-to-five office workers.
"If Scotland is serious about creating a wellbeing economy, then a four-day week is a key way to make progress towards it."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel