A CONSULTATION on abolishing Scotland’s “not proven” verdict is due to start this year.
The change was one of several reforms to the justice system set out by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon in her Programme for Government to Holyrood yesterday.
Those who wish to abolish the controversial third verdict, which is not used in jurisdictions outside Scotland, say removing it will help to address low conviction rates in rape and sexual assault cases.
Another consultation is due to take place on whether the dual role of the Scottish Government law officers should be separated.
The Lord Advocate is currently both the head of the Crown Office and the chief legal advisor to the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: 'Very strong case' for abolishing Not Proven verdict, Justice Secretary says
Following the dispute over the handling of harassment complaints about Alex Salmond, other parties including the former First Minister’s Alba had called for these two roles to be separated.
Sturgeon committed to examining the issue when the current Lord Advocate, Dorothy Bain QC, was appointed in April.
The First Minister also said the Gender Recognition Reform Bill would be introduced to Holyrood during the first year of the current Parliament.
Last week, the Government confirmed it was moving ahead with the legislation, which aims to reform the legal process which allows people to change their gender following the co-operation agreement with the Scottish Greens.
Sturgeon said: “I understand that some have sincerely held concerns about this legislation. It is therefore worth stressing what it will do – but also what it will not do.
“It will make the existing process of gender recognition less degrading, intrusive and traumatic.
“In other words, it will make life easier for one of the most stigmatised minorities in our society. I think that is something any Parliament should feel a responsibility to do.
“What it will not do is remove any of the legal protections that women currently have.”
She added: “We should never forget that the biggest threats to women’s safety come – as has always been the case – from abusive and predatory men; from deep seated sexism and misogyny; and, in some parts of the world, from lawmakers intent on taking away basic freedoms and removing the rights of women to control our own bodies.”
During her statement she also pledged to invest £100 million over the course of the parliament to tackle domestic abuse and violence against women, and support the frontline organisations who help them.
READ MORE: How Not Proven verdict played its part in controversial trial
She added that the government would also take account of the recommendations of the Working Group on Misogyny and Criminal Justice, which is due to report next year.
“We will also take forward our ground-breaking Women’s Health Plan. And move to incorporate key human rights conventions into domestic law,” she stated.
As well as plans to strengthen existing homelessness prevention legislation, the statement included proposals to invest £50m in a new Ending Homelessness Together Fund over the course of the parliament, with £12m in 2021-22.
Crisis, the homelessness charity, said the new measures aimed at preventing people from losing their homes could make Scotland a world-leader in tackling the issue. Plans to consult on new homelessness prevention duties follow publication of the Scotland Prevention Review Group report earlier this year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here