BORIS Johnson was accused of “fleecing Scottish families” and steaming ahead with “austerity 2.0” during a row over the National Insurance tax hike at PMQs.
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford slammed the Tory tax plans as “regressive” and warned that the policy would penalise the youngest and poorest workers in society.
Blackford dubbed the increase "a Tory poll tax" and said the Prime Minister should be “ashamed” of himself for the policy, the scrapping of furlough and cutting the Universal Credit uplift, which will disproportionately impact those on lower incomes.
Blackford said this was a prime example of why Scotland needs to become an independent country, to protect workers from Tory cuts and tax hikes.
READ MORE: National Insurance hike: Boris Johnson told to 'keep mitts off' Scotland's NHS
The UK Government announced earlier this week that to raise tax for social care in England, there will be a 1.5% percentage point rise in National insurance contributions.
This would cost an extra £255 for those on a £30,000 salary and £505 for those on a salary of £50,000.
But the main concern amongst the opposition to the plans is the impact of those on low incomes – combined with the loss of furlough and extra £20 a week Universal Credit payment.
And Blackford didn’t hold back in his scathing assessment of the policy.
Blackford and Johnson clashed over the planned NI hike during PMQ's
During PMQs in the House of Commons Blackford began by slamming the “regressive” tax plans and the impact they will have on Scottish workers.
He said: “The Joseph Rowntree Foundation estimates that around two million families on low incomes will now pay an average of an extra £100 a year because of the Prime Minister’s tax hike.
“Yet again the Tories are fleecing Scottish families, hitting low and middle income workers and penalising the young.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon announces work to begin on new independence prospectus
“A former Tory work and pensions secretary called it a sham, a former Tory chancellor has said this is the poor subsidising the rich, a former Tory prime minister has called this regressive.
“Prime Minister, isn’t this the case that this Tory tax hike is once again balancing the books on the backs of the poor and the young?”
Johnson, who did not respond to many of the points raised, said in response: “The Right Honourable gentleman says there was no consultation, I much enjoy my conversations with representatives of the Scottish administration and one thing they said to me was they wanted more funding for the NHS.
"And I’m delighted that we’re putting another £1.1 billion into the NHS in Scotland.
“While all they can talk about is another referendum, and I think that is a clear distinction between us and the Scottish nationalist parties about what are the real priorities of the people of this country.”
Blackford continued and noted that Johnson didn’t answer his question, adding that he should be “ashamed of himself” by forcing the tax hike on the young and poor.
He said: “We now know the economic direction of this toxic Tory government.
“We’re going to see furlough scrapped, Universal Credit cut, more tax hikes for the low paid, let us be in no doubt – this is the return of the Tories austerity agenda.
“It is austerity 2.0. On this Prime Minister’s watch the United Kingdom now has the worst levels of poverty and inequality anywhere in north west europe, and in work poverty has risen to record levels this century.
READ MORE: Tory MSP tells Aberdeen theatre of 'concerns' over Janey Godley's pantomime role
“More Tory austerity cuts will make this even worse. Scotland deserves better.
“There is clearly no chance of a fair covid recovery under this Prime Minister and under this Westminster government.
"Isn’t it the case Mr Speaker that the only way to protect Scotland from Tory cuts and their regressive tax hikes is to become an independent country, with the full powers needed to build a fair, strong, equal recovery for the people of Scotland?”
Blackford was visibly displeased at the Prime Minister's response to his questions
Johnson replied and said he believed independence was “the right priority” for the people of Scotland.
He said: “I’ll just remind him of the words of the deputy leader of the Scottish government who welcomed, when the Labour government put up NI by a penny to pay for National Health Service ... he said I’m absolutely delighted. This is a guy called John Swinney, I’m absolutely delighted that the chancellor of the exchequer has now accepted the progressive, progressive, taxation is required to invest in the health Scotland. I mean, get your stories straight.
“This is more cash for people in Scotland, it’s more investment for families in Scotland, it’s good for Scotland and good for the whole of the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel