YOU almost have to feel sorry for the anti-independence pressure group Scotland in Union. They must have thought the path was clear for them to use their now-familiar tricksy poll question about “leaving the United Kingdom” to convince the media that support for independence has dropped.
Instead, just hours after their own new poll was published, the first genuine independence poll for around a month appeared right on cue – and in fact showed the first outright pro-independence majority in any poll from any firm since just prior to the Holyrood election in the spring.
It’s tempting to view the Opinium/Sky News poll as marking a Yes resurgence after a difficult period. The reality, though, is that there have been four Scottish polls from Opinium in 2021 so far and none of them has shown a No lead.
READ MORE: 'Not news': Sir John Curtice's analysis of Scotland in Union's independence poll
Three of the polls have had Yes very slightly ahead, and the other was a dead heat. At face value, then, the story is really one of Yes maintaining its strength, rather than making a plucky comeback.
It’s true that there’s been a four-month gap between the last Opinium poll and the new one and that other pollsters have tended to report a No lead in the interim. But that may be misleading because only one firm – Savanta ComRes – has shown No opening up clear daylight, and that was a pattern that had already been established by the time of the 50/50 Opinium poll in early May.
It looks like there is some sort of “house effect” that has caused ComRes in recent times to produce much better results for No than other companies. And given that they’ve conducted polls relatively frequently, that may have led us astray about the true state of play.
Take ComRes out of the equation and the consistent tale of the polls since around February has been of a very evenly split electorate which has oscillated between giving Yes and No a wafer-thin advantage.
The fact that the new Opinium poll shows the first Yes lead in a while may indicate a slight uptick in support for independence, but it could also just be a normal fluctuation caused by the margin of error. As ever, that question can only be answered by further polls. Supporting evidence of a genuine pro-Yes swing could come in the shape of outright Yes leads in Survation or Panelbase polls, or perhaps a closing of the gap in ComRes polls.
Away from the independence question, Opinium have also given us some rare post-election voting intention figures for the Scottish Parliament. They’re nothing short of devastating for the Unionist parties, who are entering their 15th year of waiting for the SNP honeymoon to end.
READ MORE: Independence ahead and SNP four points up in latest voting intention poll
Nicola Sturgeon’s party now have an outright majority of the constituency vote – something that has never been achieved by any party in an actual Holyrood election. The Conservatives can at least reassure themselves that their vote has only dropped back slightly, but there’s no such consolation for Labour, who have slumped to an even more dismal third place than they suffered in May.
The team around Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar seem firmly convinced that they “won the campaign, not the election”, but if that was really true they wouldn’t be finding themselves going backwards in subsequent polling.
Both the SNP and the Greens will take heart from Opinium’s finding that 44% of the public think the quasi-coalition deal is good for Scotland and that only 33% think it is bad. But it’s worth remembering that most co-operation agreements tend to be popular when they’re first signed. The real test will come after the public has seen what shared governance looks like in practice.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel