NUCLEAR weapons must be removed from the River Clyde within three years of an independence vote, SNP members agree.
At today's party conference, which is being held remotely, members voted by 528 to 14 in favour of a resolution calling upon "a future SNP government of an independent Scotland to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland within three years".
Speaking in favour of the move, SNP CND convener Bill Ramsay urged members not to allow HM Naval Base Clyde, which houses the Trident system, to become "Guantanamo on the Clyde", retained as UK territory in a sovereign Scottish state, and Joan Anderson of the party's Glasgow Kelvin branch spoke against the potential for a "Gibraltar model" which would allow "de facto colonial possession" of the site, near Helensburgh.
That's after the Financial Times published leaked proposals earlier this month which reveal ministers in London could seek to shift lease the base from a Scottish states.
Other suggestions include shifting the nuclear submarines and missiles to France or America. Devonport in Plymouth and Milford Haven in Wales have also been suggested as alternative sites.
READ MORE: Scottish independence: Six in 10 want indyref2 by 2026, Tory think-tank finds
However, the Ministry of Defence dismissed the report, saying: "The UK is strongly committed to maintaining its credible and independent nuclear deterrent at HM Naval Base Clyde, which exists to deter the most extreme threats to the UK and our Nato allies.
"There are no plans to move the nuclear deterrent from HM Naval Base Clyde, which contributes to Scotland's and the wider UK's security and economy, and its supporting facilities are safe for local communities."
Under SNP defence diversification plans, the base could become the headquarters of an independent Scottish conventional military, a move which could cushion the local economy from the impact of Trident removal.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel