A TORY minister has been dubbed detached from reality after making false claims about how Universal Credit claimants can offset an upcoming benefits cut.
Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey suggested people who are set to lose £20 a week under Conservative plans could work an extra two hours to make up for the loss.
The Cabinet minister defended the move to end the £20 uplift, which was introduced in response to the coronavirus pandemic, by saying it had always been "temporary".
Coffey told BBC Breakfast: "I'm conscious that £20 a week is about two hours' extra work every week – we will be seeing what we can do to help people perhaps secure those extra hours, but ideally also to make sure they're also in a place to get better paid jobs as well."
"£20 a week is about two hours extra work every week, we will be seeing what we can do help people perhaps secure those extra hours”
— BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) September 13, 2021
On #BBCBreakfast Work and Pension Secretary Thérèse Coffey says the increase to universal credit was always temporary.https://t.co/tHeCXwNJyZ pic.twitter.com/RbZNtIn3PQ
That suggestion was rubbished as opposition politicians pointed out at the taper system which is applied to Universal Credit means claimants would have to work for far longer than two hours to earn £20.
SNP MSP Elena Whitham commented: “Tories are totally out of touch with the reality of being in work and still in poverty. It is not just a matter of working 2 extra hours per week or getting a better job. That is akin to the old pull yourself up by the bootstraps mantra.”
She added that Coffey’s claim was incorrect, writing: “UC rules mean it is more like an extra six hours to make up the £20 uplift.”
READ MORE: SNP pass resolution urging Tories to make Universal Credit uplift permanent
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner replied: “This is a lie and the Work and Pensions Secretary either knows she’s lying or shouldn’t be in the job.
“An additional £20 for a UC claimant isn’t 2 hours work, that’s not how the taper works. An extra £20 would require £50+ worth of hours, that is how the UC system works.”
This is a lie and the Work and Pensions Secretary either knows she’s lying or shouldn’t be in the job. An additional £20 for a UC claimant isn’t 2 hours work, that’s not how the taper works. An extra £20 would require £50+ worth of hours, that is how the UC system works. https://t.co/i4HzfDzJO8
— Angela Rayner (@AngelaRayner) September 13, 2021
Pressed about asking people to work longer, Coffey said: "It's a temporary uplift recognising the reason that it was introduced is coming to an end."
She also said the UK is "seeing record numbers of vacancies".
The benefits increase will be phased out from the end of the month, based on individual claimants' payment dates.
Recipients could lose £1040 annually if the UK Government goes ahead with the cut.
Under UK Government social security rules, every £1 earned while on Universal Credit triggers a 63p reduction in your benefits if you are earning more than the Work Allowance threshold, which is set at £293 a month, or £515 a month if your benefits don't include housing support.
Those meeting that criteria would therefore need to work for at least six extra hours to make up the £20 a week loss.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel