SCOTLAND'S charity regulator has launched an investigation following claims that Prince Charles's charitable foundation accepted a six-figure sum from a wealthy Russian donor.
Charles, the Duke of Rothesay, wrote a letter thanking the businessman for his generous offer to the Prince’s Foundation last year and suggested they could meet after the Covid crisis.
But the £100,000 was reportedly later rejected by the ethics committee of the foundation, whose headquarters are in Scotland, following concerns about its provenance, according to the Sunday Times.
The investigation launched by the Scottish Charity Regulator comes shortly after an alleged cash-for-honours scandal which saw Michael Fawcett temporarily step down as the foundation’s chief executive earlier this month.
READ MORE: Prince Charles aide quits amid claims he 'fixed' CBE for Saudi tycoon
A spokesperson for the Scottish Charity Regulator said: “We have been working with the Prince’s Foundation to better understand the use of the organisation’s funds, and to gain a full understanding of the work which is being undertaken by the charity’s trustees to investigate the range of issues which have been raised.
“We have written to the trustees informing them that we will investigate these matters under the powers set out in section 28 of the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 and will follow up any additional queries as they arise.
“It is the responsibility of all charity trustees, the people who manage and control a charity, to act at all times in the interests of the charity and comply with their legal duties in doing so. In particular, they must ensure that all funds are spent in achieving the charity’s purposes, and ensure that grants or donations are used in line with any conditions imposed.
“We will consider what, if any, further action is appropriate for us to take when we have been able to fully consider information provided to us by the charity.”
Last week, Clarence House said the prince had “no knowledge” of the alleged cash-for-honours scandal after Charles and Fawcett, one of his most trusted confidants, were reported to the police over the claims.
The pressure group, Republic, contacted Scotland Yard and reported both the future king and Fawcett, Charles’ former royal valet, on suspicion of breaching the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925.
The chief executive is accused of promising to help secure a knighthood and British citizenship for a Saudi billionaire donor.
READ MORE: Prince Charles and Michael Fawcett reported to police over cash-for-honours claims
Charles is president of the foundation but not involved with its governance, with the charity’s trustees overseeing its day-to-day activities.
An investigation has been launched into the allegations relating to Fawcett by an independent team on behalf of the foundation’s trustees
A Clarence House spokesperson said about this investigation: “The Prince of Wales fully supports the investigation now under way at the foundation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel