POST-BREXIT border controls on food and farming imports from the EU are to be delayed again, a UK minister has confirmed.
It'll be 2022 before the measures that were supposed to go live next month will actually come into force.
It's a further delay on the UK side, with the EU implementing full checks on UK exports of goods since the start of the year.
Brexit minister Lord Frost says Covid is to blame for the latest shift, which tears up a plan laid out in March.
In a written ministerial statement, the peer said: "The pandemic has had longer-lasting impacts on businesses, both in the UK and in the European Union, than many observers expected in March.
"There are also pressures on global supply chains, caused by a wide range of factors including the pandemic and the increased costs of global freight transport. These pressures are being especially felt in the agri-food sector.
READ MORE: Brexit hurting Covid recovery in Highlands and Islands, firms say
"In these circumstances, the government has decided to delay further some elements of the new controls, especially those relating to sanitary and phytosanitary goods."
The move comes only a week after the UK extended the truce in the so-called "sausage war" with Brussels by rolling over grace periods associated with the Northern Ireland Protocol to allow goods, including chilled meats, to continue to cross the Irish Sea without checks after September.
Frost said the delays on post-Brexit checks applied mainly to "sanitary and phytosanitary goods" coming from the EU, with new requirements for export health certificates pushed back by as much as nine months from October to July 2022.
The announcement also comes after ambassadors to the UK from both France and Germany criticised Lord Frost's threat to unilaterally suspend the Northern Ireland Protocol amid cross-Channel negotiations over reforming the Brexit terms that have caused issues for trade across the Irish Sea.
On Monday, Frost (above) told peers there was "ample justification" for triggering Article 16, a statement French representative Catherine Colonna called "troubling". German diplomat Andreas Michaelis accused the UK of becoming "less flexible" in talks to resolve the problems caused by the protocol.
Following the decision to delay bringing in extra checks, the Food and Drink Federation reacted angrily, arguing it "penalised" those who had prepared for the checks, some of which were due to come in to force next month.
READ MORE: John Curtice: What the UK public really thinks of Brexit
Chief executive of the federation Ian Wright said: "Many food and drink manufacturers will be dismayed by the lateness of this substantial change.
"Businesses have invested very significant time and money in preparing for the new import regime on October 1.
"Now, with just 17 days to go, the rug has been pulled.
"This move penalises those who followed government advice and rewards those who ignored it. As recently as yesterday, officials assured us that import checks would be implemented as planned.
"The repeated failure to implement full UK border controls on EU imports since January 1 2021 undermines trust and confidence among businesses. Worse, it actually helps the UK's competitors.
"The asymmetric nature of border controls facing exports and imports distorts the market and places many UK producers at a competitive disadvantage with EU producers."
The CBI urged both sides to use the extra time wisely, calling for action on a shared veterinary agreement and also for the UK to loosen immigration measures amid stock shortage issues caused by a lack of lorry drivers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel