YOU can say what you want, but one of Scotland's biggest bands has gone from No to Yes.
Texas say Brexit means they now back Scottish independence.
In 2013, frontwoman Sharleen Spiteri was amongst the high-profile names backing the Union.
At the time, she backed devolution rather than indy, saying: "As far as I’m concerned, I’m British. And, yeah, I’m Scottish but I feel I’m part of the UK.
"I think it’s very important to have a Scottish government who make decisions for Scotland but I can’t understand how Scotland would survive independently.
"We don’t have the resources – like oil and gas – we’d need to keep Scotland afloat.
READ MORE: Brexit: Covid blamed for new nine-month delay on EU import checks
"And to me, if you can’t survive, then what’s the point of breaking away?"
But now the Getaway singer has changed her mind.
On Saturday the Express newspaper wrote an article based on Spiteri's 2013 comment, linked to her curent promotion of the band's latest album Hi.
It was headlined: "Sharleen Spiteri: Independent Scotland 'can’t survive' as 'we don’t have the resources'"
In response, the band's official Twitter account issued a short post saying: "This is not true. After Brexit, Sharleen and the rest of the band now support Scottish Independence."
This is not true. After Brexit, Sharleen and the rest of the band now support Scottish Independence. https://t.co/T5MGKdnFo4
— Texas (@texastheband) September 13, 2021
That's triggered a massive response, racking up more than 6000 likes and in excess of 150 comments.
READ MORE: My path from No to Yes on independence and working at The National
One poster responded: "I changed my mind on the issue following Brexit as well", while another said: "A significant number of us did too, it has been strengthened as we see Johnson as PM in England. That's why my support for Scottish Indy 2 is so strong now, and I'm confident it will succeed."
"Yaaaaas," said another, commenting that "Sharleen and Texas are back in the room".
And a fourth said: "I always loved Sharleen and Texas no matter their preference."
"I don’t want a Union I just need EU," joked another, "it’s got a ring to it."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel