THE Scottish Government’s flagship payment scheme to help poorer children is a “sticking plaster” which fails to tackle the root causes of inequality, MSPs have been told.
Nicola Sturgeon has insisted that the Scottish Child Payment, which gives £10 a week to parents on low incomes for each child, is a game-changer in the fight against poverty.
But with the First Minister coming under pressure to double the amount given to £20 a week, local government leaders at Cosla insisted that “simply giving people money is not going to fully assist them”.
Parents with children under the age of six can receive the payments, if they are in receipt of qualifying benefits, though ministers plan to expand the scheme to all under the age of 16.
Cosla resources spokeswoman Gail Macgregor said the payments had “helped to top up low-income families and people who are very vulnerable”.
But she added while the cash could be “beneficial in the short term” for hard-up families, it was “not necessarily getting them the key support they require”.
Macgregor insisted: “Simply giving people money is not going to fully assist them. It might help to get them over that particular week, or that particular month, but we need to get to the root cause of the inequality and ensure that that particular family absolutely has the support in place to ensure a better outcome going forward.”
She continued: “Money is a sticking plaster. It’s a very helpful sticking plaster, but it doesn’t get to the root cause of the inequality.
“We’re looking at health and wellbeing and supporting families. This links with quality of housing, education, employment, ensuring that families are assisted with services that will help to enrich their lives.
“I think the key message is whilst it is beneficial in the short term to perhaps give a family some additional income, it is not necessarily getting them the key support they require.”
SNP MSP John Mason (above) said: “If a family is short of food or can’t afford to heat their house, the cash is pretty helpful, isn’t it?”
Macgregor told him: “It is useful in the short term, but what is possibly more useful is ensuring that people in that family are empowered and assisted into better employment, encouraging them to utilise other services in their communities that can assist them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel