OFCOM is still investigating a BBC Radio 4 interview with Baroness Ruth Davidson back in February, despite saying its findings would be published at the beginning of this month.
John Parker complained about the February 28 World at One (Wato) interview, which came ahead of the anticipated, but postponed, appearance of Alex Salmond before the committee investigating the Scottish Government’s handling of harassment allegations against him.
He said that in a 12-minute slot at the top of the programme, Davidson was given more than five minutes to allege institutional corruption and an SNP cover-up, with no serious challenge against her.
In the interview she said there were questions over whether Scotland’s democratic institutions were corrupt.
Parker recorded the programme segment and transcribed it, claiming: “All in all, a very one-sided and tendentious presentation to be making with Holyrood elections just a few weeks away.”
The BBC rebuffed his complaint at every level, after which he took it to Ofcom, but said he was frustrated that it was taking so long to investigate it.
Ofcom told The National in August its finding would be published in one of its fortnightly online bulletins after the August bank holiday weekend.
However, it did not appear and Ofcom later told us the complaint was “still being assessed”.
Yesterday, they said that was still the case.
Parker, who is English by birth but a long-time resident of Wales, said: “Whenever I look at the Ofcom website, I see many investigations launched, complaints assessed and decisions made on broadcasts occurring much later than February 28, 2021. For me the February 28 World at One item was a disgrace, and the BBC should be held to account for it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel