FIRE and rescue workers at a nuclear submarine base have begun an overtime ban over “major safety concerns”.
Unite said members are taking action in a dispute over cuts to fire and rescue crew levels, and a lack of consultation.
It said that Capita management has reduced the specialist fire safety crew by eight positions at HM Naval Base Clyde, also known as Faslane, which is home to the UK’s nuclear submarines, and the Royal Naval Armaments Depot at nearby Coulport.
The union said it believes the cuts impair the abilities of the onsite fire crews to do their jobs properly, particularly in relation to incidents that would involve wearing breathing apparatus.
Debbie Hutchings, Unite industrial officer, said: “Unite’s fire and rescue workers at Capita will start an overtime ban from Thursday, September 16 over our major safety concerns at the Coulport and Faslane naval bases.
READ MORE: UK Government's 'secret' plans for Trident after independence revealed
“We have been in dialogue with Capita since their decision to press ahead with cutting the fire response services at the bases, but more concerns have been raised throughout this process.
“There is a lack of clarity, cohesion and co-ordination about what would exactly happen in several major incident scenarios. We simply haven’t received any credible answers to our questions.
“It’s deeply worrying that in all the years the bases have been in operation, there hasn’t been a practical exercise for maximum credible incident scenarios with all the relevant agency involvement.
“These are routine exercises which are regularly done on other safety-critical sites but they are not happening at the naval bases.”
Unite said members at Capita supported taking action short of a strike by 100%, while 78% supported taking strike action in a ballot turnout of 91.1%.
The company provides fire response services for the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
A Capita spokesman said: “We are disappointed by Unite’s decision to proceed with industrial action regarding MoD-approved changes that have been made to resourcing levels at Faslane and Coulport.
“We have a range of contingency options agreed with Defence Fire and Rescue and the Royal Navy’s Clyde leadership team which will ensure the delivery of fire service operations is maintained.
“Our recommendations to increase or decrease resourcing levels at any MoD site have to be endorsed by Defence Fire and Rescue’s chief fire officer, and ultimately approved by the site’s leadership team.
READ MORE: CND warn SNP conference delegates not to let indy Scotland get stuck with Trident
“Any such decision would follow on from a thorough review of fire risks. In this case, our proposed changes were also validated through the conduct of four confirmatory exercises and a lengthy process of scrutiny by the base leadership team.
“Capita is working with Defence Fire and Rescue to modernise the MoD’s fire and rescue capability. Our £85 million investment in new firefighting vehicles, digital technology, and enhanced training facilities is improving firefighting capabilities and reducing risk to our firefighters, MoD personnel and critical military assets.”
The company said that Faslane is due to receive four, new, firefighting vehicles by the end of the year and is in the final stages of agreeing the location of onsite breathing apparatus training facilities at Coulport, to improve firefighter safety and minimise the need for firefighters to travel for training.
A Navy spokesman said: “Safety at HMNB Clyde will not be compromised by the proposed industrial action and Capita will provide contingency arrangements to ensure that on-site fire and rescue cover is maintained.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel