THE now-former "Jim Crow" Rock has gone under a redesign after a number of people reported taking offence at the name and previous "golly" design of the landmark.
The vile Jim Crow laws in the USA made racial segregation and discrimination legal in certain states, and "Jim Crow" was a term of racial abuse in some states.
As travel became more global, an increasing number of visitors were taken aback by a rock which, to those not aware of the local history, seemed to be a racist totem.
In 2017 Neville Lawrence (below), whose son was murdered in a racially motivated attack in 1993, told the Dunoon Observer he was “really disappointed to see such a thing” during a visit to Argyll and Bute.
READ MORE: Father of Stephen Lawrence expresses anger at Scottish town's 'Jim Crow' rock
He told the paper: “I have been coming to Scotland for many years, and since my son was murdered. Before that, I was part of the campaign to release Nelson Mandela which brought me there many times. There was a large group of us, 14 or so, who went into a pub in Glasgow.
“Nobody stopped and stared, it was very welcoming, and so when I returned to London I would tell people how different it was. I always look forward to coming to Scotland.
“I find it very disappointing that there is this thing that makes people feel very uncomfortable.
“We are all human beings. If you cut us, our blood is red. We do not need to have this kind of division in the world. We do not need to love each other, but we do need to respect each other.”
The "two Johns", Dunoon residents John Farrell and John Kelsall, approached then-MSP Michael Russell and former MP Alan Reid for help.
Russell used his offices to facilitate meetings and agreement between intersted parties, and those for and against redesign.
READ MORE: Michael Russell: A metaphor for our need to rid ourselves of racism
As a result of the series of meetings Dunoon Grammar School was approached, and the school’s art department agreed to run a competition for a new design and to paint the rock when a winner was chosen.
After a very popular public vote Alex Fraser’s puffin design was chosen by public vote - but plans to paint the rock had to be put on hold because of the pandemic.
Alex Fraser with his winning design for the rock
Earlier this week the rock was painted and the Puffin Rock was born.
Lucy Neish of Dunoon Grammar’s art department explained: “Alex Fraser helped paint his winning puffin design, ably assisted by Alasdair Coy and Advanced Higher Art and Design pupils Yeliz Altin, Amber Gray and Joshua Dominick.
“This final part of the project was made possible by John Kelsall who painted the undercoats in preparation for today’s paint, alongside.
“Also thanks to Iain Hurrel who donated the marine paint, to make this a lasting project.”
Dunoon Grammar School art students Alasdair Coy, Alex Fraser, Yeliz Altin, Amber Gray and Joshua Dominick after painting the Puffin Rock
Speaking on behalf of the two Johns, Farrell said: “We think that Dunoon’s young people have done a wonderful job coming up with fresh ideas for a new design and helping to paint ‘The Puffin’.
“We hope that this fun landmark will be enjoyed for generations to come.”
READ MORE: Dunoon's racist ‘Jim Crow’ rock is set to be scrubbed
Former Argyll and Bute MSP Russell said: “It has been a long haul but huge thanks are due to those who started this process - and particularly the ‘two Johns’ as they have become known - by refusing to accept that the ‘Jim Crow’ rock had any place in a modern Scotland, whether or not the name and the painting were accidental, former Moderator Rev Lorna Hood who facilitated the first difficult steps, to everyone who helped devise the competition to rename and repaint, to the winner and to the super talented Dunoon Grammar team supervised by Lucy Neish and supported by the gift of paint from Iain Hurrel’s Marine Blast, who made it happen.
“There now needs to be work done on an interpretation board which tells this inspiring story and on getting the ordinance survey to recognise the new name - but all this demonstrates how good things can happen in communities if there is a determination to change and an enthusiasm to see a project through, no matter how difficult.
“Everyone in Cowal should be pleased today.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here