A FATHER has told how he was left “shell-shocked” after he almost lost his son to a hospital-acquired infection following an operation to remove the boy’s kidney.
Cameron Gough told the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry he did not expect to be put in a position where “a building almost killed our son”.
The inquiry began hearing evidence yesterday into problems at two flagship Scottish hospitals that contributed to the deaths of two children.
Gough’s 10-year-old son was diagnosed with cancer after he became unwell in July 2018 when he was aged seven. He was found to have a kidney tumour.
In early September 2018 he had an operation to remove the kidney but his condition deteriorated after the operation and his room filled with medical staff battling to stabilise him.
Gough told the inquiry: “When you see the fear in doctors’ eyes, the fear of the intelligent people, not the trainees but the really intelligent people, that’s scary, that was difficult to cope with and we kind of steeled ourselves for dealing with cancer and the implications of cancer, what we didn’t expect was to be put in a position where a building almost killed our son.
READ MORE: Hospitals probe to hear oral evidence from patients and families
“And that’s really to put it brutally – a hospital-acquired infection was the point we came closest to losing our son. Later I said, it was only a line infection, compared to what had happened with cancer and getting the kidney removed and the doctors said no, this was the thing we are most concerned about. That put the fear of God into me, because my son has just had his kidney out, he has just had treatment for cancer and the most concerning thing about this weekend is a line infection.” Gough told the inquiry the same thing happened the following day, and medical staff again managed to stabilise his son. He was told the problem was a hospital-acquired infection, described as a “poo bug”.
Gough said he was left “shell shocked” by the experience and said “it shot my confidence in the hospital an awful lot”.
He praised QUEH’s Schiehallion children’s cancer unit but said he was concerned about levels of cleanliness in other areas of the hospital. On one occasion he found “brown matter” on the bed in the room his son was placed in and had to have it changed. After that experience he started cleaning rooms his son was put in as he was not confident they were clean.
The inquiry is investigating the construction of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) campus in Glasgow and the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and Department of Clinical Neurosciences in Edinburgh.
The inquiry was ordered after patients at the Glasgow hospital died from infections linked to pigeon droppings and the water supply, and the opening of the Edinburgh site was delayed due to concerns over the ventilation system. Steve Love QC is appearing on behalf of 54 parents
or family members of patients, represented by Thompsons Solicitors Scotland, who were or are still being treated on the children’s cancer ward and neonatal unit at QEUH.
In his opening statement, he said children were “faced was serious infections, life threatening additional illnesses and a catalogue of other problems as a result of the hospital environment, the hospital water supply and the conduct of some of the medical staff there”.
Love said: “Parents of the children affected want answers for what happened, what went wrong and why. Many of them have lost faith in the hospital as a safe place for their children to be treated.”
Earlier this year, an independent review found the deaths of two children at the QEUH were at least in part the result of infections linked to the hospital environment.
READ MORE: Significant failings across key areas found at Glasgow's QEUH
The review investigated 118 episodes of serious bacterial infection in 84 children and young people who received treatment for blood disease, cancer or related conditions at the Royal Hospital for Children at the campus.
It found one-third of these infections were “most likely” to have been linked to the hospital environment. Two of 22 deaths were, “at least in part”, the result of their infection, it said.
In his opening statement, Peter Gray QC, representing NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, said it welcomed the inquiry and is determined to ensure that the issues which have required to be addressed in both hospitals do not arise in other future NHS infrastructure projects.
The inquiry in Edinburgh, chaired by Lord Brodie, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here