ALISTER Jack has been urged to get his facts straight after refusing to accept the Scottish Government has a mandate for a second independence referendum.
The Scottish Secretary insisted indyref2 should not go ahead because Nicola Sturgeon has “gamed” the electoral system.
But that assertion was based on the false claim that the pro-Yes Scottish Greens – who have signed up to a co-operation deal with the SNP – did not put up candidates in constituency votes in this years’ Holyrood election.
Asked why he believes the First Minister does not have a mandate, Jack told STV it was because she did not secure an outright majority, despite the SNP and Greens forming a pro-independence majority.
READ MORE: 'Beyond belief': Top historian rubbishes Alister Jack's Scottish Border claim
He added: “When Alex Salmond came forward with the Alba Party, she [Sturgeon] said he was gaming the system. She said he wasn’t standing on the first part the post list, it was just on the regional lists. And that she called gaming the system.
“Well the Greens didn’t stand first past the post, so by her own definition she’s gaming the system.”
Alister Jack says these are the conditions for another independence referendum.
— kathryn samson (@STVKathryn) October 5, 2021
1: A generation (which he defines as 25 years) must have passed and,
2: 60% support for a referendum sustained over 12 months and,
3: 60% support for independence sustained over 12 months. pic.twitter.com/5PD4MVpTjZ
However, the Greens did in fact contest first past the post votes in May, fielding candidates in a dozen constituencies.
Scottish Green activist Guy Ingerson commented: “The Scottish Secretary isn’t very well informed about Scottish politics it seems… @ScottishGreens stood in 12 constituencies. I should know, I stood in one of them. No ‘gaming’ of the system involved.”
SNP MSP Ben Macpherson added: "Eh hud on a minute, you’re proper clutching now Secretary of State.
"I quite clearly remember [Greens co-leader] @lornaslater standing in the Edinburgh Northern & Leith constituency for the @scottishgreens in the [Scottish Parliament] election … By the way, she came 3rd – your party was 4th!"
Jack went on to rule out another referendum for at least 25 years, which he deemed to be a “generation”.
READ MORE: Alister Jack accuses Holyrood of 'irresponsible nationalism' in transport row
Setting out in the circumstances in which he believes a second vote should go ahead, the Tory minister said: “The trigger in my mind, and I look to the situation in Northern Ireland for instance, if 60% of people wanted a referendum and that position was sustained for over 12 months, if 60% of people wanted independence and that position was sustained for over 12 months, then I can see there would be a desire for a referendum.
“But [referendums] can’t come every five or six or seven years. The SNP would only have to win once if we just keep asking the question.” The Scottish Government has stated that it intends to hold indyref2 by the end of 2023, Covid permitting.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel