THE Scotland Office will not say whether it considers Scotland a nation, as criticism over an “extremely sinister revelation” by a UK minister grows.
Scotland Secretary Alister Jack last week contradicted the promise made by David Cameron to voters in 2014’s independence referendum.
In an essay titled “Union is Strength” published last week, the minister wrote: “I am no fan of the ‘four nations’ expression, for the Union gives us one great nation.
“Yes, we can still celebrate the differences within our borders. Of course, it is possible to be, say, a proud Scot and at the same time be a proud Briton. We can all take pleasure in the regional variations that make us different.”
His remarks stand in opposition to Cameron’s words ahead of indyref1.
WATCH: Alister Jack comes up with bogus excuse to deny indyref2 mandate
In an address on September 14, mere days before voters went to the polls, the then prime minister said: “The United Kingdom is not one nation. We are four nations in a single country.”
The SNP have now told Jack his position as Scotland Secretary is “untenable”.
The Sunday National asked the Scotland Office whether it remained government policy that the UK was made up of four nations, or whether it was now in line with Jack’s statement that there are only “regional variations”.
A spokesperson told us: “The Secretary of State’s words speak for themselves.”
Jack’s comments put himself out of step with the majority of Scotland.
In the 2011 census, only 8% of respondents described their national identity as “British only” as Jack did. A further 18% said they felt their identity was both “Scottish and British”.
READ MORE: Alister Jack accuses Holyrood of 'irresponsible nationalism' in transport row
The combined total of those still falls well short of the 62% who identified themselves as “Scottish only”. Jack’s essay was published in “Strength in Union: The Case for the United Kingdom” by conservative think tank the Centre for Policy Studies.
The collection was edited by Scottish Tory Andrew Bowie, who echoed the minister’s sentiments in his own essay.
The Aberdeenshire MP said that “the greatness of our country” is that “we are four peoples in one”.
SNP MSP Rona Mackay (below) pointed to Jack’s remarks as highlighting how out of touch he is with the people of Scotland.
She said: “These views of Alister Jack should concern everyone. To believe Scotland is a ‘regional variation’ and not a distinct nation goes way beyond the Tories’ so-called muscular Unionism – it is British nationalism, pure and simple.
“Since his professional position as Scots Secretary is founded solely on Scotland being a nation in the UK, it is an utterly unsuitable opinion for him to hold and publicise.
“He is theoretically meant to be Scotland’s voice in the Tory cabinet, but he believes Scotland as an entity doesn’t exist and we should simply shut up and go away.
“It appears British nationalism is now the official stance of this government – and that disrespects the 2014 indyref vote, which was on the basis of Britain being four nations.
READ MORE: Alister Jack accused of 'rewriting Good Friday Agreement' with border poll comments
“Equally, it shows how out of touch the likes of Jack and the Tories are with the people of Scotland when, in the last census, only 8% of people who live here identified themselves as ‘British only’.
“The Tories think they can use their power to impose their beliefs on more than five million Scots, which explains their motivation behind taking the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Bill to court.
“At the very least this is an extremely sinister revelation that surely renders Alister Jack’s position as Scots Secretary untenable.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel