THE UK Government missed its 2020 fuel poverty targets and is already at “high risk” of failing to meet its goals for 2025 as well, according to its own advisers.
In a highly critical report published today, the Committee on Fuel Poverty said it was “unacceptable” that the Government had failed to achieve its aim of ensuring all fuel poor homes had an energy efficiency rating of E or higher by 2020 “despite schemes and sufficient funding being able to meet it”.
Only 55% of the 293,000 fuel poor homes with ratings of G or F in 2015 had been upgraded by 2020.
The committee, set up in 2015 to advise the Government on tackling fuel poverty, said in its annual report that only 15% of funding to improve energy efficiency and help with fuel bills actually went to households in fuel poverty.
READ MORE: Energy crisis: Ian Blackford calls on Kwasi Kwarteng to support businesses
The report said: “Government failed to apply its own fuel poverty guiding principle to target available funds on assisting those in the deepest levels of fuel poverty to improve the energy efficiency levels of their homes and assist them to pay their fuel bills.
“Instead, assistance was targeted (and continues to be targeted) predominantly on higher income households.”
The warning comes as concerns about energy bills continues to mount thanks to spiralling wholesale gas prices. Regulator Ofgem raised its energy price cap by 12% this month and analysts fear the cap could rise again by nearly 30% in April 2022.
This would mean bills rising by as much as £400, prompting fears more households could be pushed into fuel poverty.
Many of the problems highlighted in Wednesday’s report were originally raised in the committee’s first annual report in 2016.
That report found only 10% of funding for fuel poverty schemes actually went to households in fuel poverty, while the Government did not know the address of the majority of the 3.2 million fuel poor households.
The 2021 report found the Government still did not have this information, saying: “Although the number of fuel poor households can be estimated… the addresses of these households are unknown and hence it is difficult to target assistance to them.”
The committee also highlighted concerns that the move to net-zero could increase fuel bills in the short term, meaning more support would be necessary, but objected to the diversion of money for energy efficiency into decarbonisation projects.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon Ted Talk: FM to make climate crisis speech today
The report said: “Whilst we understand Government’s commitment to decarbonise heating, it is important to recognise that decarbonisation is not the same as fuel efficiency as it does not necessarily lead to reduced fuel bills.
“We must protest that using budgets originally targeted at energy efficiency for other means will undermine the achievement of the fuel poverty 2025 milestone and 2030 target and our recommendation therefore is that additional resources should be allocated for heat decarbonisation instead.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here