BORIS Johnson has sought to end a spat among senior Tory ministers over access to a grace and favour country mansion.
Liz Truss and Dominic Raab have been locked in a battle for access to Chevening, a 115-room Kent country house, since the Cabinet reshuffle last month.
Truss sought to stake her claim to the property β which is traditionally reserved for foreign secretaries β when she replaced Raab in the role.
However Raab fought a rear-guard action to keep it after being made Deputy Prime Minister as well as the more junior position of Justice Secretary.
Pleased to welcome our three Baltic partners to the UK.
β Liz Truss (@trussliz) October 11, 2021
π¬π§ supported their independence in 1991. 30 years on, we stand with them once again to advance freedom and democracy πͺπͺπ±π»π±πΉ
I look forward to discussing how we boost economic and security ties to face down malign actors. pic.twitter.com/TWOCTAJ332
READ MORE:Β Three times Liz Truss has been mocked by Scots for embarrassing blunders
In the end, Johnson β as first reported by The Times β decided that, rather than risk upsetting one or other of his colleagues, they should share it.
He cited the precedent of the last time there was a deputy prime minister β Sir Nick Clegg β who shared it with then foreign secretary Lord Hague of Richmond and later his successor Lord Hammond of Runnymede.
A Government spokesman said: βThe Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary will share access to Chevening as has happened in previous administrations.β
The ruling by Johnson β who has been holidaying in Spain β came after Truss provocatively posted a picture online of herself meeting the foreign ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia at the Grade I-listed building.
Under the terms of the Chevening Estate Act 1959, the house β which is privately owned by a board of trustees β is occupied by someone nominated by the Prime Minister.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. Weβve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who arenβt really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So thatβs why weβve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate β and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about β people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Letβs get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel