EMPTY supermarket shelves, gas shortages and a mass pig slaughter.
It seems Brexit isn’t going all that well.
Unless you’re Oliver Mundell, that is.
The Brexiteer Scottish Tory stuck to his guns during this week’s BBC Debate Night show, even if it meant repeatedly blasting his own foot.
The MSP, during a heated debate with pro-independence football pundit and National columnist Michael Stewart, showed what it takes to still believe in the Vote Leave project: a massive dose of delusion.
“Does he accept Brexit is not working?” Stewart asked.
“No I don’t accept that,” Mundell replied somewhat unconvincingly. “I think we’re in the early stages that’s come at a difficult point during a global pandemic.”
READ MORE: Tony Blair's former aide says UK can't keep Scotland in the Union without consent
Maybe the UK Government shouldn’t have dragged us out of the EU in the middle of it then, Oliver?
He continued: “We’re seeing serious disruption to the energy market around the world.”
But before he could try to claim that Britain wasn’t in an especially bad position due to Brexit, Stewart interjected: “Is there anywhere else that’s slaughtering pigs on a level that they are here?”
Mundell squirmed: “I, I don’t know is the answer to that question.”
Thankfully, there was someone on hand who could clear up his confusion.
James Withers, chief executive of ScotlandFood & Drink, replied: “No.”
Mundell stumbled on: “I’m sure he could answer the question for me, but what he won’t do, and what you won’t do and what so many people in our established political circles won’t do, is speak up for the million people in Scotland who voted for Brexit.”
He added: “That’s more people than elected Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister in 2016.”
If you’re having to rely on ridiculous comparisons like that, you’ve already lost the argument, as Twitter users were only too happy to point out.
One commented: “More people voted for independence than voted for Brexit. Hey this is easy.”
Another wrote: “Two different electorates so that comparison is meaningless. Have you nothing better than that, @olivermundell?”
Well played, Michael Stewart.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel