FIRMS that have sponsored the COP26 climate conference have described it as "mismanaged" and "very last minute".
The United Nations climate summit is due to kick off in Glasgow on Sunday, October 31 and is being run by the UK Government from within the Cabinet Office.
Some of Britain's biggest companies have been brought on to sponsor the event with millions of pounds of investment being pumped into what is being described as a "vital" conference.
World leaders will be heading to Glasgow for the event, but the big companies sponsoring it have blamed "very inexperienced" civil servants for delayed decisions, poor communication and a breakdown in relations between organisers and companies.
READ MORE: Is the UK Government deliberately trying to torpedo talks at COP26?
In a letter to the organisers which was seen by the Guardian, these concerns and other problems were raised.
The letter was written by broadcaster Sky and co-signed by senior figures from other COP26 sponsors.
Aside from Sky, the summit has 10 other major sponsors or "principal partners" including Scottish Power, SSE, Unilever, NatWest, Sainsbury's, Glaxo Smith Klein (GSK) and Microsoft.
There are also five lower-level "partners" including the Jaguar Land Rover Group and Ikea.
The UK is running the climate summit from within the Cabinet Office with former business secretary Alok Sharma (below) now the COP26 president.
A source, employed by a COP26 sponsor, said that "the biggest frustration" was the lack of information from the organisers about how the event will run with important questions going unanswered and planning decisions delayed.
READ MORE: Inside look: All you need to know about COP26 agenda and timetable
The source told the Guardian: "They had an extra year to prepare for [COP26] due to Covid, but it doesn’t feel like this time was used to make better progress. Everything feels very last minute."
Sponsors had been brought on with the promise of "outstanding opportunity" and "unique benefits" including the ability to promote brands at the event's "green zone".
However, the companies have complained about unmet expectations and concerns about the delay to green zone plans.
The source blamed "very young and very inexperienced" civil servants planning the event with the source adding: "It’s clear that many of them have very little experience managing relationships in the private sector, or even experience attending a COP event."
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn to hold ‘alternative COP26’ in Glasgow and Edinburgh
Energy sponsors Hitachi, National Grid, Scottish Power and SSE are also understood to be frustrated having been under the impression that there would be no other energy brands featured at the event.
However, the "blue zone", run by the UN will feature other brands.
A COP26 spokesperson said: "We are working closely with all our COP26 Partners ahead of the vital summit in Glasgow. Working with corporate sponsors increases the value for money for taxpayers, and reduces the overall financial cost of COP26.
“We are committed to hosting an inclusive summit in two weeks' time, which showcases innovative work from a range of businesses and civil society groups who are committed to tackling climate change together. Ministers are continuing to focus their time on helping to secure a positive outcome in Glasgow."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel