ALL asylum seekers should have the right to work and the UK Government should seek consent from Holyrood before enacting its “anti-refugee bill”, according to new polling seen by The National.
The findings come from wide-ranging research set to be published by the Scottish Refugee Council today.
The polling, by Survation, reveals welcoming attitudes towards those seeking sanctuary, with 47% saying they’d be happy if a refugee family was housed in their local area, compared with 11% who’d be unhappy, and 82% said “people deserve to live in dignity while their asylum claim is processed”.
Meanwhile, 79% of the 1000-plus people surveyed agreed refugees are “ordinary people just like us” and 77% of people stating that those seeking refugee status “should have the right to work to support themselves and their families”. Only 7% disagreed with this.
On Priti Patel’s Nationality and Borders Bill — dubbed the anti-refugee bill by campaigners due to measures that would criminalise all those who reach the UK by irregular means — 45% said that “would deliver a hammer blow to the UK’s ability to help people fleeing for their lives in crises such as that in Afghanistan today”, while just 13% disagreed with the statement.
A provision in that bill has raised grave fears over potential drownings in the English Channel, stating that officials would "not be liable any criminal or civil proceedings for anything done" while turning around small boats carrying refugees seeking asylum in the UK.
READ MORE: Experts reveal groundbreaking plan to end destitution in Scotland
And the vast majority – 66% – said the UK Government should “consult or seek consent” from the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government due that bill’s impact on devolved legislation like criminal justice.
Most people thought the Scottish Government, not the UK Government or Home Office, who should hold responsibility for decisions on identifying and supporting trafficking victims in Scotland.
The findings are to be released during the UK-wide Together With Refugees week of action.
Sabir Zazai, who leads the Scottish charity, said: "The majority of people in Scotland want to live in a country in which people seeking safety are treated with dignity and can live as members of communities who are able to support themselves and their families through work.
"Scotland wants to welcome refugees. I have had the privilege of witnessing this warm welcome first hand as our staff supports people to integrate into communities across the breadth of the country, and as we continue to receive so many incredibly generous offers of support from the Scottish public for people fleeing Afghanistan.
READ MORE: Sabir Zazai: I've seen the best of 'British values' are not in Westminster
"Sadly, this warm welcome is not reflected in legislation from Westminster. The UK Government’s anti-refugee bill seeks to implement an even more hostile regime, which criminalises people seeking sanctuary and houses people in institutional accommodation with little control over their lives.
"These simply are not the wishes of the people of Scotland. It is not too late for the UK Government to scrap this anti-refugee bill and stand together with people seeking protection to build a humane and fair asylum system of which we can all be proud."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel