BORIS Johnson has refused to commit to wearing a face-covering in Parliament despite an appeal by UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid for Tory MPs to mask up when they are in the House.
After Tory MPs were seen crammed on the Commons benches, almost all with faces bare, Javid urged them to set an example to the public in order to avoid the need for tighter Covid restrictions over the winter.
But speaking to reporters during a visit to a vaccination centre in West London, Johnson sidestepped a question about whether he would now wear a mask in Parliament, in line with his government's guidance.
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg says Tory MPs don't need face masks for this ridiculous reason
“I think there are lots of steps that we need to take to continue to follow the guidance,” he said.
“So commonsensical things, washing your hands, wearing a mask in confined spaces where you are meeting people that you don’t normally meet.
“That’s sensible.”
Johnson’s refusal to commit to wearing a mask himself came as scientists advising the Government warned the failure of public figures to follow official guidance risks undermining public trust.
A paper by the Spi-B group of behavioural scientists noted that a return to mandatory face coverings in public places in England was one of the elements in the UK Government’s Plan B if the situation with the virus worsens over the winter.
“It would also create expectations for public figures serving as role models to demonstrate adherence in the required settings,” it noted.
READ MORE: No basis for Sajid Javid's claim about wearing masks around 'strangers', MP admits
“Trust can be eroded by unclear and inconsistent messaging [and] government officials and role models not engaging in behaviours in line with guidance.”
The paper said there was already “public confusion” over the effectiveness of masks and that a return to mandatory face coverings could lead to “lack of compliance and confrontations”.
“Some members of the public may resist reintroduction of mandatory face coverings and changing perceptions of risk may empower anti-authoritarian narratives or prompt public protests,” it said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel