GLASGOW City Council chief Susan Aitken insists Glasgow is ready to welcome world leaders for COP26 despite issues with bin collections and rats.
The SNP politician clashed with Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross during questioning by Westminster’s Scottish Affairs Committee ahead of the UN climate summit.
Aitken stated Glasgow is ready "with caveats" for the conference and said none of the problems the city faces are "enough to cause panic".
The council boss argued that other cities are dirtier than Glasgow and she is "not embarrassed" about its condition.
She said it is "entirely gratuitous" to suggest the city is in a state of disrepair but that cleansing staff are "working round the clock" ahead of the climate summit.
The Glasgow City Council leader said: "The Cop26 co-ordinating board within the council met last week and the verdict was that we are ready, with caveats.
"I would say the caveats are mainly technical, some of them have already been resolved or are being ticked off.
"None of them were massive, none of them were enough to cause panic."
Moray MP Ross asked whether the "technical issues were that the bins are overflowing, there's rats in the streets and some of your employees have been taken to hospital while collecting that rubbish?"
Aitken rejected that description during a tetchy exchange in which committee chair Pete Wishart was forced to intervene. However, Aitken did acknowledged there have been "small incidents" where rubbish collectors had been taken to hospital after "very minor contact with a rat".
The GMB union has confirmed it is aware of four binmen being taken to hospital after rat attacks, but Aitken told the committee there was "one, possibly two at most".
The SNP councillor said: "Our cleansing employees occasionally experience rats.
"It's also not something that is unique to Glasgow, it's something that's happening right across the UK – all cities have rats."
READ MORE: FM demands Boris Johnson reverses 'inexplicable' snub to Scots carbon capture plant
Addressing concerns about the rubbish situation, Aitken added: "This is not unique to Glasgow. And what I reject entirely are suggestions that Glasgow is somehow particular in this, it is peculiarly challenged in relation to any of these things."
The council leader also told the committee that 12,000 additional hours have been worked to clean Glasgow ahead of COP26, with 150 new rubbish bins deployed across the city.
She added: "According to Keep Scotland Beautiful, Edinburgh was actually worse impacted by these [rubbish] issues during the pandemic, but I don't recall anyone saying 'Edinburgh should be embarrassed about having the festival'.
"We are – as are other cities globally – working to address the very serious challenges and impacts that were caused by the pandemic, but we were never going to be able to recover overnight from the impact on our services on the city.
"I believe we are making considerable progress, we're working round the clock to address those issues – particularly in the Cop26 zones in the city – but actually right across the city.
"Our services are not just for VIPs coming to Glasgow, we're not working to have our services recover from that impact of Covid just because Joe Biden's coming to town; we're doing it for our citizens because, actually, our services are for them, first and foremost.
"So no, I'm not embarrassed. I'm confident that the visitors coming to Glasgow will see - as they always see – an incredibly vibrant, diverse, and welcoming urban space."
Nicola Sturgeon has also insisted Glasgow is prepared to host the UN summit.
The First Minister told reporters: "I think there are challenges in Glasgow and challenges in cities across Scotland, the UK, the world – some of them related to Covid, some of them more fundamental than that.
"I'm not going to stand here and say they don't exist in Glasgow.
"I think Glasgow is ready for Cop26.
"Glasgow – as it has been with big events in past years – will be an excellent host for Cop26, and that's important.
"But – as all countries do – we have challenges in our public services and how we make sure they're delivering in the post-Covid era."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel