MORE than 60 charities, unions and community groups have urged Nicola Sturgeon to "explicitly condemn" proposals for a huge new oil operation off the coast of Shetland.
Plans for the Cambo oilfield have met with fierce opposition since they emerged earlier this year. It's thought there are around 800 million barrels of oil at the site, 75 miles out to sea, with production spanning up to 25 years.
The UK Government, which retains authority over the matter, granted an exploration licence 20 years ago and, subject to approval by Westminster's Oil and Gas Authority, drilling could begin next year. Sturgeon has said the permit there "must be reassessed", given the climate crisis, and that her government's forthcoming energy strategy will oppose unlimited extraction of fossil fuels as "not consistent" with climate obligations.
As the clock runs down to the start of COP26 in Glasgow on Sunday, the multi-member Stop Climate Chaos Scotland (SCCS) has written to the First Minister urging her to ask Boris Johnson to reject Cambo and all new oil and gas projects.
The letter requests that Sturgeon make the intervention "quickly, clearly and publicly".
Caroline Rance of Friends of the Earth Scotland, which is part of SCCS, said: "The First Minister has now acknowledged that unlimited drilling for oil and gas is incompatible with the climate crisis, and has said that the Scottish Government will end their support for drilling every last drop of oil and gas from the North Sea. The reality of the climate crisis is so devastating and the consequences of approving this field are so grave, that the First Minister must now address the elephant in the room and strongly reject Cambo.
READ MORE: Scottish Catholic leaders cut oil and gas ties in £3.1bn global action
"Climate science is clear that there can be no new oil and gas projects. Instead, we need a managed phase-out from the North Sea in line with keeping global temperature rises to 1.5ºC, while scaling up renewables and ensuring a just transition for affected workers and communities."
And Oxfam Scotland head Jamie Livingstone stated: "Climate change is already wreaking havoc around the world and continuing to burn more and more fossil fuels will only result in more deaths, more poverty and more suffering.
“The fact that on the eve of COP26 the Prime Minister is still weighing up whether or not to green light an enormous new oilfield at Cambo is utterly inconceivable, incompatible with the Government's stated climate ambitions and inconsistent with the need to inspire much faster global climate action.
“Now is the time for the First Minister to send an unequivocal message to the Prime Minister on Cambo – not in our backyard, not on my watch and not in Scotland’s name."
While a report from the UK Committee on Climate Change said Scotland had decarbonised more quickly than any G20 nation, Sturgeon has conceded that the Scottish Government has failed to meet its last three annual environmental targets.
READ MORE: Stirling University researchers turn to space to make the Black Sea blue again
On a transition away from fossil fuels, she said: "Tens of thousands of jobs are dependent, currently, on oil and gas production. Those jobs and the people in them matter. And, of course, much of our energy use is still catered for by oil and gas.
"For countries like ours, with significant remaining reserves of oil and gas, it is tempting to tell ourselves that for both economic and energy reasons we must keep exploring for and extracting oil and gas until the last possible moment. That, in my view, would be fundamentally wrong.
"It’s an approach that cannot be justified in the face of the climate emergency, but it can’t be justified economically either."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel