THE US government's legal challenge over a judge's decision not to extradite Julian Assange is to be heard by the High Court.
Assange, 50, is wanted in the US on allegations of a conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information following WikiLeaks' publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
After a multi-week extradition hearing, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled in January that Assange should not be sent to the US, citing a real risk of suicide.
Wednesday's hearing marks the start of the two-day legal challenge at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.
The US authorities were previously given the go-ahead to argue against Judge Baraitser's decision on five grounds.
In August, the High Court heard that the US government's appeal will argue there is a legal requirement that an individual must be "so ill" that they are unable to resist suicide for a decision to be taken not to prosecute, or in Assange's case, extradite, them.
READ MORE: What's the connection between Julian Assange and Craig Murray?
Clair Dobbin QC, for the US, previously said: "It really requires a mental illness of a type that the ability to resist suicide has been lost.
"Part of the appeal will be that Mr Assange did not have a mental illness that came close to being of that nature and degree."
Dobbin also told the court that the need for scrutiny is "substantially increased" given the background, including the "extraordinary lengths" Assange has already gone to in order to avoid extradition.
Judge Baraitser concluded there was a real risk Assange would be submitted to special administrative measures and detained at the ADX Florence Supermax jail, if extradited.
However, the US has previously said it has provided a "package of assurances" in response to the district judge's findings, including that it would consent to him being transferred to Australia to serve any prison sentence he may be given.
Assange has been held in Belmarsh Prison since 2019 after he was carried out of the Ecuadorian embassy in London by police before being arrested for breaching his bail conditions.
He had entered the building in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face sex offence allegations, which he has always denied and were eventually dropped.
The hearing before the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett and Lord Justice Holroyde is due to start at 10.30am on Wednesday.
It is expected to end on Thursday with a decision at a later date.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel