DOUGLAS Ross must be “disappointed” that the threat of rail strikes during COP26 has been averted, the First Minister pointed out this afternoon.
During First Minister’s Questions, the Scottish Conservative leader attacked the deal between ScotRail, the Scottish Government and the RMT union, questioning why they “suddenly” decided to accept the agreement.
He was critical that the long-term rail dispute took world leaders visiting Scotland for the climate summit in order for a resolution to be found. Sunday services have been extremely limited as part of the same industrial action for many months.
The deal struck last night includes a 2.5% pay rise, backdated to April, as well as a COP26 payment of £300 for staff. There is also a three-hour book on allowance applied to each rest day worked, which will be applicable for three months from the date of agreement.
Nicola Sturgeon said the agreement with RMT was “virtually identical” to the deals accepted by other transport unions earlier this week.
Ross rejected that description, and went on: “What the First Minister didn’t say in her first answer or her second answer was sorry. Sorry to the people of Scotland, who have been waiting for months for her government to step up and resolve these issues. It has been resolved now, but it should have resolved far sooner, because people have been struggling with these strikes since March.”
During his questioning, the Moray MP also expressed concerns over potential protests at next week’s UN climate summit in Glasgow and asked if there would be a “zero-tolerance approach to protests that disrupt people going to their work”.
Sturgeon responded by first suggesting Ross wanted the strike action to go ahead.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak 'proud' to bypass Scottish Parliament in levelling-up scheme
“I think what Douglas Ross is really displaying here, if truth be told, is a real disappointment that the rail strike has been resolved. Because he would have rather seen it continue.
“He wants to know the detail … given that he didn’t check the detail before coming into the Chamber today … the deals already agreed by the other unions consisted of for the first year 2.5% backdated for 2021, a £300 COP26 payment and a rest-day working agreement.
"The deal agreed with the RMT last night consisted of a 2.5% backdated for 2021, a £300 COP26 payment and a rest-day working agreement. So that sounds to me pretty identical to the one that had already been agreed by three of the four unions.
“It’s good news for those who travel on our railways. It’s good news for the Scottish population, which is probably why Douglas Ross is so deeply irritated by it.”
On protests, the First Minister said Police Scotland had made clear that there will be sensitive policing at COP26, with everything possible done to facilitate appropriate and peaceful protest. However those that break the law or disrupt beyond “what is reasonable” will see a response.
READ MORE: SNP MP absolutely tears into Jacob Rees-Mogg's mask claims
“People do want to come and make their voices heard, I think that is understandable given the importance of the issues under discussion. But I would say to people looking to come to protest in Glasgow, do it peacefully and do it with the recognition that the people of Glasgow are agreeing to host this conference, are suffering some disruption because of that, so don’t add to that disruption for them, but let’s all get behind those who will be negotiating, I hope, a good outcome for the future of the planet.”
In his contribution Ross suggested the First Minister should “show some humility” after rail passengers faced disruption for a long period this year.
The Scottish Conservative leader asked if Sturgeon is confident about COP26, noting it had been a “rocky road” to get here given the strike threat and travel disruption fears.
The First Minister said she is confident, but reminded Ross that the UK Government is the one in charge of hosting the event. “Douglas Ross is actually sounding a bit disappointed that the UK Government decided to bring COP26 to Glasgow,” she joked. “Perhaps he wants to direct some of these concerns to them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel