THE BBC has unveiled plans for what it claims is its “biggest and most significant push” to ensure its content is fair, accurate and unbiased.
The move comes in response to the publication of the Serota Review into governance and culture at the broadcaster, which was published today and made a number of recommendations on improving editorial standards.
The review, led by Arts Council England chair Sir Nicholas Serota, states the organisation “needs to do more to embed editorial values into the fabric of the organisation”.
READ MORE: BBC has ‘pathetically soft-touch’ on Tories as lack of negative stories revealed
It added that “a number of those we interviewed felt that individuals, including high profile and senior staff, have not always been held to account for breaching editorial standards”.
Sir Nicholas said in a statement: “There is no doubt the BBC is a very different place to that of 25 years ago and, thankfully, progress has been made.
“Nevertheless, there is an opportunity for the BBC leadership team to go further and ensure that accuracy, impartiality, fairness and integrity are embedded more deeply across the organisation.
“The BBC can and should be properly held to account against these core values and standards.
“This can only be achieved through improved transparency and openness, both internally and externally.
“We have every confidence the BBC leadership understands this and also the very real need to deliver these improvements on behalf of audiences.”
READ MORE: Michael Russell: Why the BBC’s treatment of Scotland is an open sore
The review was commissioned by the BBC board following Lord Dyson’s scathing report into the circumstances surrounding Martin Bashir’s 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales.
The Serota Review made six recommendations for the BBC which include extending impartiality training throughout the organisation.
It also recommends the BBC’s board monitors impartiality through metrics including editorial complaints.
The broadcaster said in a statement it has accepted the review’s findings in full as it announced “sweeping changes to further raise standards across the organisation and challenge claims of bias”.
The BBC said its plan “represents the BBC’s biggest and most significant push to ensure its programmes and content are fair, accurate and unbiased and truly reflect the broad public which it serves”.
BBC chairman Richard Sharp said: “We need a BBC that is beyond reproach when it comes to impartiality, standards, processes and transparency.
“The Serota Review makes clear recommendations to the board across all these areas, which will be acted upon.
“We accept the report in full.”
READ MORE: Anger as BBC presenter asks Scots journalist about 'rats and plagues' in Glasgow
BBC director-general Tim Davie added: “The BBC’s editorial values of impartiality, accuracy and trust are the foundation of our relationship with audiences in the UK and around the world.
“Our audiences deserve and expect programmes and content which earn their trust every day and we must meet the highest standards and hold ourselves accountable in everything we do.
“The changes we have announced not only ensure we learn the lessons from the past but also protect these essential values for the future.”
Earlier this month the new Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries criticised the “elitist” approach of the BBC and said the broadcaster has a “lack of impartiality”.
She questioned whether the broadcaster would continue to exist in 10 years’ time in the face of competition from new players such as Netflix.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel