THE Electoral watchdog has today released how much the smaller political parties spent on the Holyrood election campaign in May.
Details have been set out by the Electoral Commission on the spending returns of political parties and non-party campaigners that spent £250,000 or less campaigning at the 2021 Scottish Parliament election.
Nineteen parties reported spending £250,000 or less on campaigning during the regulated period which ran from January 6, 2021, to polling day on May 6, 2021. Altogether these parties reported spending of £623,476 on campaigning at the poll.
READ MORE: COP26: Spotlight on Scotland as Nicola Sturgeon interviewed by CNN's Christiane Amanpour
Seven registered non-party campaigners reported spending £250,000 or less on campaigning during the regulated period, totalling £260,220.
Louise Edwards, director of regulation at the Electoral Commission said: “The publication of campaign spending information relating to this year’s Scottish Parliament election is an important part of delivering transparency, which is essential to our democratic process. It is vital that voters are able to see clearly and accurately how money is spent on influencing them at elections.”
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie to use COP26 to push Scottish independence case internationally
The 10 highest-spending parties that reported spending of £250,000 or less at the Scottish Parliament election 2021
Party
Expenditure
Scottish Green Party
£231,902.48
Alba Party
£214,371.00
Reform UK
£54,504.15
Scottish Family Party
£32,908.11
All for Unity
£29,620.03
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition
£13,753.40
The Reclaim Party
£10,199.37
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
£8,229.98
Freedom Alliance- Integrity, Society, Economy
£7,387.30
Communist Party of Britain
£6,419.51
Two parties spent £250,000 or less and did not submit returns by the due date. These are being considered in line with the commission's Enforcement Policy.
Political parties that spent over £250,000 campaigning at the 2021 Scottish Parliament election have until 6 November 2021 to submit their audited campaign spending returns.
Non-party campaigners that reported spending of £250,000 or less at the 2021 Scottish parliament election.
The May election saw the SNP win a record fourth term in government, with 64 seats, one less than a majority and the Greens net eight seats, their best ever result.
However, there was disappointment for Alex Salmond's Alba Party which failed to take any seats.
After the election, the SNP and Greens signed a co-operation agreement which saw the smaller parties co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater join the government as junior ministers for the first time.
Non-party campaigner
Expenditure
Scotland Matters
£56,265
Dignity and Choice in Dying
£44,044
Majority Media Ltd.
£36,399
Scotland In Union
£35,424
SB Supports the Union Limited
£34,444
Mr Brian Monteith
£33,673
Young Unionists
£19,971
Two non-party campaigners did not submit spending returns by the due date. These are being considered in line with our Enforcement Policy.
Non-party campaigners were also required to report their donations along with their spending. In total non-party campaigners reported receiving £164,471 in donations. The donations over £7,500 in relation to non-party campaigners’ political activity have also been published today.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel