HAVE the Scottish Conservatives ever tried to make political capital out of COP26, The Jouker wonders.
Tory knickers were twisted at the weekend after the SNP took out newspaper ads linked to COP26 in Glasgow, telling readers that "a nation in waiting welcomes the nations of the world".
"While not yet an independent nation, we're more than ready and able to play out part on the global stage at COP26," it added.
"Even when world leaders are in Glasgow to focus on the future of the planet, the first instinct of the SNP is to push their divisive independence obsession," frothed Scottish Conservative constitution spokesman Donald Cameron. "Nations from around the world are coming together at Cop26 in a bid to tackle the climate emergency and yet the SNP – whose failure to meet climate-change targets is dismal – would rather talk about separation."
Far be it from The Jouker to call a spade a shovel, but, well, haven't the Tories done just what they're accusing the SNP of and linked the environment to the constitution?
The Jouker had imagined seeing a tweet from the Scottish Conservatives that said it was "fantastic to hear @Douglas4Moray talking up the benefits of Scotland being part of the UK," adding: "Together, we can tackle climate change."
But that must have been a mis-rememberance, right?
Fantastic to hear @Douglas4Moray talking up the benefits of Scotland being part of the UK.
— Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) March 30, 2021
Together, we can tackle climate change👇#BBCLeadersDebate pic.twitter.com/ZZrWgtHVO9
Didn't a Tory group, the Conservative Environment Network, run a poll ahead of last month's party conference that tried to argue that we couldn't tackle climate change without Westminster? One that was reported with comments from David Duguid, Scottish Conservative MP for Banff and Buchan, saying: "This polling shows that the public recognise the need for us to work together across the United Kingdom to make the energy transition to net zero and hand on a better world to future generations.
"Here in the North East, the oil and gas industry possess much of the technology and expertise required and are fully engaged in the development of renewable and low carbon energy solutions and mitigations.
"The SNP have announced funding for the North East, but with no actual plan of action, while the UK Government has already led the way with the energy white paper, a 10-point plan for a green industrial revolution and a North Sea transition deal — all of which bring with them the prospect of tens of billions in investment and thousands of jobs."
And adding: "Scotland has two governments that need to pull together in these efforts – but the SNP are more interested in pulling the country apart.
"It’s crystal clear that without this pooling and sharing of financial resources, an independent Scotland would not be able to support communities like mine in the North East to diversify away from fossil fuels.
"As with so many other issues, on the climate, we can achieve much more together than we ever could apart."
Obviously not, sorry for making such a silly mistake.
There'd never be so much as a hint of double standards from the Scottish Conservatives. The Jouker is happy to set the record straight.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel