UK ministers have been accused of trying to “bully” the standards commissioner out of her job as anger grew at the Tories for protecting a senior Conservative from an immediate suspension.
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng (below) faced outrage for suggesting Kathryn Stone should resign in the wake of her damning investigation into former minister Owen Paterson.
Boris Johnson’s government has been accused of “corruption” after he ordered his MPs not to back the cross-party Standards Committee’s call for Paterson to be suspended from Parliament for 30 sitting days.
UPDATE: Tory government U-turns on standards committee overhaul after sparking backlash
Instead they voted for a Tory-led panel to consider reforming the disciplinary process after Paterson was found to have repeatedly lobbied ministers and officials for two companies paying him more than £100,000 per year.
Asked whether the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards should resign, Kwarteng told Sky News: “I think it’s difficult to see what the future of the commissioner is, given the fact that we’re reviewing the process, and we’re overturning and trying to reform this whole process, but it’s up to the commissioner to decide her position.”
Pushed on what he meant by “decide her position”, Kwarteng said: “It’s up to her to do that. I mean, it’s up to anyone where they’ve made a judgment and people have sought to change that, to consider their position, that’s a natural thing, but I’m not saying she should resign.”
The Tory government has since U-turned on plans to overhaul the standards system at Westminster.
Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg told MPs on Thursday morning: “The House voted very clearly yesterday to show that it is worried about the process of handling these complaints and that we would like an appeals system, but the change would need to be on a cross-party basis and that is clearly not the case."
Shadow Commons leader Thangam Debbonaire called for the Prime Minister to “immediately distance himself from these latest attempts to poison British politics”.
“Having already ripped up the rules policing MPs’ behaviour to protect one of their own, it is appalling that this corrupt Government is now trying to bully the standards commissioner out of her job,” the Labour MP added.
The Business Secretary insisted that the Government ordering its MPs to change the rules to spare a colleague did not look “sleazy” as he rejected the mounting criticism.
Chris Bryant, chairman of the cross-party Commons Standards Committee, had said the Tory move was a “perversion of justice”.
“That is not what we do in this country, it’s what they do in Russia when a friend or a foe is suddenly under the cosh in the courts,” the Labour MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon meets with Joe Biden in absolute humiliation for Tories
It was not just opposition MPs who were outraged by the move, with dozens of Tories abstaining and 13 rebelling against orders to vote for a new committee led by former minister John Whittingdale, which would re-examine Paterson’s case and whether a new standards system is needed.
Tory Angela Richardson was sacked as a parliamentary private secretary to Cabinet minister Michael Gove after she abstained.
However, she was rehired following the Government's U-turn.
Pleased to be reappointed to my role as PPS to Michael Gove. Busy department and work to get on with. #LevellingUp
— Angela Richardson MP (@AJRichardsonMP) November 4, 2021
With the Prime Minister ordering his MPs to back the move on Wednesday, it was passed with a majority of 18.
Paterson said it would allow him to clear his name after “two years of hell” and called for the resignation of Stone and others responsible for the recommendation against him.
“Sadly they have not done a good job and come up with a rotten report which is full of inaccuracies… (they) all have to go,” he said in an interview with the Daily Telegraph.
Hannah White, deputy director of the Institute for Government think thank, said it had been a “shameful day for British democracy”.
Anti-corruption campaigners and unions also condemned the Government’s actions, with Labour accusing the Tories of “wallowing in sleaze”.
The plan to establish the new committee was immediately thrown into chaos as Labour, the SNP and Liberal Democrats vowed to boycott it, depriving the panel of cross-party authority.
The row was triggered when Stone recommended a ban from Parliament of 30 sitting days for Paterson in a report subsequently approved by the Commons Standards Committee, which described the lobbying as “egregious”.
Stone’s investigation found he repeatedly lobbied on behalf of two companies for which he was acting as a paid consultant – Randox and Lynn’s Country Foods.
Paterson claimed the investigation was unfairly conducted and said the manner in which it was carried out played a “major role” in his wife Rose’s suicide last year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel