NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Boris Johnson’s government of outright corruption after a Tory minister suggested the standards commissioner should resign.
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said it was “difficult” for Kathryn Stone, who published a damning report on Tory MP Owen Paterson, to remain in her position.
The UK Government ordered Conservative parliamentarians to vote down the cross-party Standards Committee’s call for Paterson to be suspended from Parliament for 30 sitting days after he was found to have repeatedly lobbied ministers and officials for two companies paying him more than £3100,000 per year.
Paterson has since announced he is resigning as the MP for North Shropshire.
UPDATE: Tory government U-turns on standards committee overhaul after sparking backlash
UPDATE: Owen Paterson resigns amid 'indescribable nightmare' after Boris Johnson U-turn
Commenting on Kwarteng’s remarks, Sturgeon tweeted: “This is classic corruption – protecting the MP found guilty of a standards breach and now trying to hound the independent investigator out of office.
“Yesterday was a dark day for the Commons – but also a reminder of the risks this Tory govt poses to basic democratic norms.”
This is classic corruption - protecting the MP found guilty of a standards breach and now trying to hound the independent investigator out of office. Yesterday was a dark day for the Commons - but also a reminder of the risks this Tory govt poses to basic democratic norms https://t.co/GiJaBqRuJK
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) November 4, 2021
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon meets with Joe Biden in absolute humiliation for Tories
Instead of backing the suspension in a ballot on Wednesday night, Tory MPs voted for a Tory-led panel to consider reforming the disciplinary process.
Asked whether the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards should resign, Kwarteng told Sky News: “I think it’s difficult to see what the future of the commissioner is, given the fact that we’re reviewing the process, and we’re overturning and trying to reform this whole process, but it’s up to the commissioner to decide her position.”
Pushed on what he meant by “decide her position”, the Business Secretary added: “It’s up to her to do that. I mean, it’s up to anyone where they’ve made a judgment and people have sought to change that, to consider their position, that’s a natural thing, but I’m not saying she should resign.”
READ MORE: Owen Paterson: Cries of 'shame' erupt as Commons votes to protect Tory MP
The Tory government has since U-turned on plans to overhaul the standards system at Westminster.
Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg told MPs on Thursday morning: “The House voted very clearly yesterday to show that it is worried about the process of handling these complaints and that we would like an appeals system, but the change would need to be on a cross-party basis and that is clearly not the case."
Chris Bryant, chair of the cross-party Commons Standards Committee, said the Tory plan was a “perversion of justice”.
“That is not what we do in this country, it’s what they do in Russia when a friend or a foe is suddenly under the cosh in the courts,” the Labour MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme."
An ethics adviser to the Prime Minister suggested Johnson failed to uphold principles on standards by blocking Paterson’s immediate suspension.
Lord Evans, the chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said the move was a “very serious and damaging moment for Parliament”.
And the former MI5 chief criticised the Tory-led review into the disciplinary process for MPs as being “deeply at odds with the best traditions of British democracy”.
Announcing his resignation, Paterson stated: "I have today, after consultation with my family, and with much sadness decided to resign as the MP for North Shropshire.
“The last two years have been an indescribable nightmare for my family and me.
“My integrity, which I hold very dear, has been repeatedly and publicly questioned.
“I maintain that I am totally innocent of what I have been accused of and I acted at all times in the interests of public health and safety.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel