THE first “cracks” in the UK Government’s deforestation deal have begun to show after an Indonesian minister called the deal “unfair”.
On Monday it was announced that more than 100 leaders have commited to halting and reversing forest loss and land degradation by 2030.
It was hailed as the first milestone agreement, as the countries who signed up to the pledge account for 85% of the world’s forests, and the pledge was backed by almost £14 billion in public and private funding.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said consumers would be key to holding companies and financial institutions to account on deforestation “even if governments do break the pledges that they’re making” as part of the COP26 Declaration On Forests And Land Use.
READ MORE: Over 40 countries to phase out coal but not China or US
But by Thursday, the first sign of those pledges potentially being broken began after Siti Nurbaya Bakar, Indonesia’s environment and forestry minister, released a lengthy statement on social media where she said forcing the country to zero deforestation by 2020 is “clearly inappropriate and unfair”.
Indonesia was a signatory on the deal.
Environmental campaigners have called the minister’s remarks “profoundly disappointing”.
Posting on Facebook, Bakar said that the “natural wealth” of Indonesia must be “managed to its utliisation” and must be “equitable”.
She also said she rejected “deforestation terminology” claiming that it is different in Indonesia compared to European countries.
Bakar (pictured above, centre) wrote: “Forcing Indonesia to zero deforestation in 2030, obviously inappropriate and unfair.
“Because every state has its own key issues and is shaded by the Basic Law to protect its people.
“For example in Kalimantan and Sumatra, many roads are cut off because they have to go through forest areas.
“While there are more than 34 thousands villages in forest and surrounding areas. If the concept is no deforestation, it means there must be no way, then what about the people, should they be isolated?
“While the country should really be present among its people.”
READ MORE: Tory government U-turn after outrage over Owen Paterson scandal
Kiki Taufik, global head of Greenpeace Southeast Asia’s Indonesian forests campaign, said: “The minister’s statement – that comes just one day after President Jokowi signed the COP26 Forests Deal – is profoundly disappointing. It’s clear where her loyalties lie.
“She should be at the vanguard of ensuring all Indonesian citizens can enjoy their right to an intact and healthy environment as mandated in the Indonesian Constitution.
“For Indonesia to have a Minister for Environment who supports large scale developments with clear potential for environmental destruction is deplorable.
“Rather than ensuring we protect the planet for future generations, this is doing the opposite.”
It comes just days after Johnson (above) said consumers would hold companies to account over deforestation.
On Tuesday evening, Johnson said: “The pressure comes from consumers around the world who will say to those banks – whether it’s Aviva, Barclays or whoever else, that if they break that pledge there will be a democratic, a consumer price to pay and the same goes for the companies that break that pledge.
“So there’s been a big shift in the balance of power I think over forests towards consumers, towards people who care about it and who want to stop the forests being chopped down… whatever governments… even if governments do break the pledges that they’re making.
“Do you see what I’m saying?”
Greenpeace said Johnson’s comments rendered the forest deal “pretty much meaningless” and shifted the responsibility on to consumers to hold companies and financial institutions to account.
They added that it showed the “first cracks in the deal” were starting to appear.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel