MILLIONS of lower income families will remain worse off despite the Tories' last-minute changes to Universal Credit (UC) in the Budget, according to new analysis.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced in the Budget that the UC taper rate – the amount of benefit taken away for every £1 earned above the claimant’s work allowance – will be cut by eight points “within weeks”, bringing it down from 63% to 55%.
But the Resolution Foundation said around 3.6 million families will still be worse off following the earlier ending of the £20-per-week UC uplift which was brought in despite intense opposition from all the devolved nations.
The think tank’s analysis found that the changes will benefit 1.3 million higher-earning families in receipt of UC.
READ MORE: The Budget: Here's what the UK is controversially funding in Scotland
For example, a single-earner couple with two children and earning £30,000 will receive £2800 in UC under these new rules, compared to £2200 before the removal of the £20 uplift.
But for 3.6 million families – composed of all those in non-working UC families, and those in work but on lower incomes – these changes will not compensate for the removal of the UC boost, the foundation said.
More than half of families on UC will still be worse off by over £1000 a year, it added.
The think tank’s senior economist Karl Handscomb said: “The Chancellor announced two very welcome major changes to Universal Credit in the Budget last week, which will boost the incomes of low- and middle-income working families.
“These changes will allow millions of workers to keep more of each extra pound they earn as a result of marginal effective tax rates falling to rates last seen a decade ago. An additional 330,000 families will also become eligible for Universal Credit.
“But while welcome, these changes are not enough to offset the damage from the recent £20 a week cut to Universal Credit. While 1.3 million families on Universal Credit will be better off, almost three-quarters of UC families will see their incomes fall this autumn as the cost of living crunch bites."
Handscomb said UC had performed “extremely well” during the pandemic.
“But the recent cut in support means that our basic safety net remains far too weak to support families facing economic bad news,” he added.
Analysts have previously described Chancellor Sunak’s third Budget as taking the tax burden on the country to a level not seen since Clement Attlee’s Labour government in the 1950s, prompting dismay among many Conservative MPs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here