SIX Unionist campaigns spent more than £200,000 between them trying to convince Scots not to vote for pro-independence parties this May, it has emerged.
More people than ever voted in May’s Scottish Government elections – and while parties were clamouring for votes, other political groups were also trying to sway the result. We don’t yet know the full spending breakdown as the returns from larger players have yet to be published, but this week the Electoral Commission did release details for smaller parties who laid out £250,000 or less in the push from January 6 until May 6 – and for non-party campaigners.
Of the seven organisations covered, only one – Dignity and Choice in Dying, which campaigns on assisted dying – was not pro-Union. Together, the other six – Scotland Matters, Majority Media Ltd, Scotland in Union, SB Supports the Union Ltd, Mr Brian Menteith and Young Unionists – spent a combined £216,176.
That’s more than the entire spending of the Alba Party (£214,371) and approaching that by the Scottish Greens (£231,902).
Donations over £7500 in relation to non-party campaigners’ political activity have also been published.
SCOTLAND MATTERS
THE biggest spender at £56,265, most of which went on what the Electoral Commission categorises as “manifesto or referendum material”, which includes advertising. As well as £46,000 from the “Centre for Economic education and Training” in London, it took in £19,800 from a James Bickerton, making him their second-biggest backer over the period. In April, the Sunday National and The Ferret told how a James Bickerton had spent more than £9300 on Facebook ads targeting the SNP.
MAJORITY MEDIA LTD
HELMED by husband-and-wife team Mark and Mary Devlin, Majority Media is the parent company behind The Majority. It spent £36,399 on its Holyrood campaign. During the proscribed pre-election period it took in donations worth £20,189.29 whichwere reported together, not individually.
SCOTLAND IN UNION
LED by former Labour MP Pamela Nash, Scotland in Union spent £35,424 on campaigning, including almost £8200 over 10 payments to Facebook for ads. It also paid polling firm Survation £1000 in March and the biggest outlay was £12,000 to billboard firm ClearChannel. But the only donation it declared for the Scottish election period is for £1104.32, submitted under the “total value of donations not reported individually” tag.
SB SUPPORTS THE UNION LTD
AT a combined total of £11,327, a Robert Dow Kilgour was the most prolific donor to this business-focused body, which was founded by the care home tycoon of the same name. Its CEO is former Tory MEP Struan Stevenson and it spent £34,444 on campaigning, taking in £10,000 from Inchinnan firm Peak Scientific Instruments and another £10,000 from a Mr William Toner.
MR BRIAN MONTEITH
THIS former Tory MSP and Brexit Party MEP spent £33,637, taking in £9300 in donations not reported individually.
YOUNG UNIONISTS
THE Young Unionists group took in donations worth £20,000 in donations not reported individually – just more than the £19,971 it spent campaigning. Of this, all but £72 was on “manifesto or referendum material”. And 107 separate payments to Facebook were listed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel