THE Speaker of the House of Commons has apologised for getting a Labour MP’s name wrong as he was introduced to speak in Parliament.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle referred to Imran Hussain’s as “Mohammad Hussain” during a Commons session focused on racism.
The Commons Speaker said he made an “honest mistake” and phoned the Bradford East MP as soon as he could to apologise.
As Hussain rose to speak, Hoyle called him “Mohammad Hussain” – with Parliament’s official livestream, parliamentlive.tv, recording his name as Mohammad Yasin, the Labour MP for Bedford.
Shouts of “Imran Hussain” could be heard from Labour MPs calling on the Speaker to correct the mistake, as Hussain stood to speak in the urgent question about racism experienced by Yorkshire cricketer Azeem Rafiq.
In a statement, Hoyle said: “This was an honest mistake. I called Imran as soon as I could to apologise – and he accepted.”
In his speech, Hussain condemned the “violent language” faced by the cricketer in his time at Yorkshire County Cricket Club.
The Labour MP also criticised the cricket club for not having shared a “full copy” of the report into what happened to Rafiq with the public, instead having only sent a redacted version of the report to its former player.
“It is shocking that even after all this that the House has requested a full copy of the report and has been denied it,” said Mr Hussain.
Culture minister Chris Philp later made similar calls for the report to be released publicly, as did the Conservative chairman of the Culture and Sport Select Committee, Julian Knight.
Hussain added that the language experienced by Rafiq was “not friendly banter”, but was “racism plain and simple” and was the “tip of the iceberg” of the “normalisation of racism” in sport.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel