A HIGHLANDS and Islands MSP has called for the creation of an Inverness City Council in an effort to have the largest local authority in Scotland work better for the people that live there.
Emma Roddick made the call in Holyrood on Thursday as she asked whether the Scottish Government would consider local government reform.
Roddick, and many who live in the Highlands, believe that the Highland Council is too big and that the interests of people in Inverness do not correlate with those who live in Wick which are not the same as the issues people face in Fort William.
The Highland Council covers an area larger than Wales which has 22 different local authorities and 40 parliamentary constituencies represented in the Senedd.
A local authority the size of ours cannot efficiently represent neither urban nor rural constituents. Our councillors do fantastic work but they are hamstrung by administrative boundaries that simply do not serve Highlanders well.
— Emma Roddick MSP (@Emma_Roddick) November 11, 2021
It is time for an Inverness City Council.
However, the population of the Highland Council local authority was around 235,000 at the last available estimate, which is about a third of the population of the Glasgow City Council area.
While the Scottish Government currently has no plans for local government reform as George Adam told Roddick in Holyrood, the Highlands and Islands MSP believes this is an issue important to many in the region.
Roddick, who also sits as a Highland councillor for the Inverness Central ward, told The National: "I spoke to the minister after the formal back and forth and he told me the same thing he said in the chamber. I told him he can expect some follow-up letters from me."
She added: "If you take an interest in politics in the Highlands then you are painfully aware that the Highland Council doesn't work. It's not necessarily the fault of councillors is not necessarily the fault of officers, it's just that it doesn't make sense as an area.
"We saw it with Boundary Scotland trying to play around with the ward boundaries. There was outrage because there's just no way to make it make sense."
READ MORE: What it's like trying to find a home in a Highland 'tourist hotspot' right now
The boundary changes to Highland Council were not backed by the Scottish Parliament and will not go ahead.
The proposals would have seen Inverness lose two wards but gain two councillors and the far north of the region would have lost three councillors.
Roddick added: "What I would look at is the policy needs for the areas in question. Can you legislate for an area which is the fastest growing city in the country [Inverness], and an area facing depopulation, with the same approach? I don't understand how the answer could be Yes."
Due to a 15% growth in population since 2001, Inverness was declared Scotland's fastest-growing city last year. Indeed, around a quarter of the Highland Council's total population (61,235 people) live in or around Inverness.
Conversely, many areas of the Highlands are facing depopulation as locals are unable to find employment and when they do, can often find it difficult to get a home.
Another option Roddick presented was that of a municipality system, whereby there would be a regional council with smaller councils underneath. The council has a version of this with area committees of wards in the same area - something other councils also have - but these committees are only really able to make recommendations to the council and have very little overall power.
Encouraging the creation of an Inverness City Council, Ballot Box Scotland shared a map of what the new local authority could look like.
The below map would mean that a lot of ward boundaries would have to be changed but it does take in all the urban areas of Inverness where the Inverness South ward currently takes in a large rural area along with the slice of the city.
-chanting- Do it, do it, DO IT
— Ballot Box Scotland (@BallotBoxScot) November 11, 2021
Inverness City Council as a transitional demand to Scotland as a whole actually having Local Government like every other country outside these isles has Local Government, rather than what are effectively Regional Policy Conveyors. https://t.co/AEV9qmB2jJ pic.twitter.com/AOSOyS3O9f
When contacted for comment about the break-up of the authority, a spokesperson for the Highland Council told The National that the council does not have a fixed position on the matter as no official discussions on such a proposal have taken place.
READ MORE: Highland tenants protest over house fires caused by 'outdated' fuse boxes
In his response to Roddick in Holyrood, Scottish Cabinet minister George Adam said: "We currently have no plans to change the council area. I understand the geographic challenges for Highland Council were recognised when it was first created.
"Unfortunately, these challenges did not allow for a practical solution that would have enabled the area to be split up and those challenges have not changed."
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Local government in Scotland has been made up of 32 local authorities since 1996, the legislative basis for this was The Local Government (Scotland) Act 1994 and any future changes would involve legislation.
“We understand the challenges for Highland Council, due to its large geographical area and dispersed population, but at present there are no plans to change the council area.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel