THE Scottish Tories would lose half their Westminster seats at a general election as voters withdraw their support for the party amid claims of sleaze, according to a poll published today.
The latest Panelbase survey for The Sunday Times puts backing for the SNP at Westminster at 48% (up one point since September) while support for the Conservatives has slipped two points to 21%, Labour is up one at 20% and the Lib Dems are unchanged on 7%.
Sir John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University, forecasts the SNP’s tally of MPs would rise from 48 to 53. The Tories would lose half their existing six seats, Labour would be stuck on one and the Lib Dems would fall from four to two.
READ MORE: Senior Scots Tories face losing seats in General Election, poll suggests
The poll also found that support for the SNP and independence is holding up, with the party tipped to gain seats at the next UK general election though it also found that less than a quarter of voters now expect Scotland to become independent in the next five years.
Support for independence has edged up one point to 49% with opposition at 51 per cent (-1). However, less than a quarter (23%) now believe independence is likely within the next five years — a fall of three points.
The results come after the UK government firmly rejected calls for it to support a second independence referendum, seven years after the last vote on the issue.
While the Scottish Government has not ruled out seeking to hold another referendum without UK support, there are concerns it a Holyrood bill to hold a vote may not be regarded as legally competent by the Supreme Court, should a legal challenge be launched to it by the Conservative Government.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories rage at Boris Johnson's 'self-inflicted' sleaze scandals
The poll of 1,781 voters in Scotland between November 9 and 12 came as the SNP prepares for its November conference and amid weeks of headlines over Tory sleaze and cronyism which Scottish Tories fear will damage the party north of the Border. Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced to tell the world's press that the UK "was not corrupt" when he faced the media at COP26 in Glasgow on Thursday.
Yesterday the SNP claimed the Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross MP was “knee-deep in the Tory sleaze scandal”. The claim came as Ross referred himself to the Commons standards commissioner for failing to declare thousands of pounds in outside earnings.
According to a report in The Herald, the MP failed to declare £28,218.57 in outside earnings from his second job as an MSP and third job as a football referee. The undeclared income included £6,728.57 from 16 football matches in 2021 and 2020, and £21,490 in a top-up salary from his role as an MSP.
While his outside earnings were well known, the SNP said that, since being elected, Ross has missed multiple votes, events and parliamentary meetings at Westminster and Holyrood to earn money from running the line on a football pitch.
Ross told the newspaper: “Since realising my mistake last week, I contacted the Office of the Register of Interests and made them aware of the situation. All payments have now been declared, including those from my MSP salary that are donated to charities.”
Many experts believe the next general election may be held in 2023 or 2024.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel