MAINSTREAM newspapers focused on the economic aspects of independence in the run-up to the 2014 referendum, publishing a disproportionate number of stories looking at its potential “speculative, negative consequences”.
And academic Dr David Patrick has said if people believed those arguments then, they will likely believe them if there is another indyref in the next few years because the “frightening” message that Scotland cannot afford independence would be the dominant “factor” – and would be tied to Covid-19.
He said that even though the first Scottish independence referendum was only seven years ago, the events are still in fairly close living memory for many people, as with the 2008 financial crash and General Election in 2010.
Patrick, who wrote “Front-Page Scotland Newspapers and the Scottish Independence Referendum”, told Scotonomics – the Scottish Economics Show on YouTube – that between 2010 and the first indyref, the country had already gone through four years of “Conservative-led austerity.”
READ MORE: Holyrood set for larger pro-independence majority at next election, poll says
This had led to libraries and a number of other services being closed or removed, along with financial safety nets which many people had come to depend upon.
“People went into 2014 as a result of that [2008] crash, and as a result of government policies, demonstrably struggling,” said Patrick.
“It meant that if you’ve been going through a period when you’re already worrying about your household bills, how are you going to pay for this, how you’re going to cover this, it’s the news.
“But if the press then almost collectively say, ‘if you embarked on independence all these things are going to get worse”, you can completely understand why some people may be receptive to that sort of fearmongering, because it’s playing on people’s ... anxieties.”
“Without exaggerating the case, from my reading of the sources certainly, in 2014, everyone in Scotland was apparently a professional economist, especially people who were professional columnists or opinion piece writers. By no means can I actually speculate or hypothesise on how much understanding various journalists would have in these ... discussing economics seems to go hand in hand with political correspondents to a degree, but beyond that, there were people who aren’t even necessarily professional journalists, they’d be more like guest columnists or MPs or the like who were providing the material in these instances.
Patrick said people who were struggling to make ends meet were told in 2014 that independence could lead to their household bills and mortgages rising – “very real concerns” for people at every stage of their lives.
READ MORE: Rush to indyref2 will fail if Yessers aren’t ready to win the arguments
“That doomsday style reporting would have had an impact at any time because it always does, but given the historical context of when it happened ... that was something that most people had experienced for the better part of five years or more.
“As long as you’ve got governments of any colour which are going to stick to this programme of austerity, it is going to tighten household budgets, it’s going to make people more desperate if you make them more
receptive to these types of negative economic messages.”
He said he would be “fairly sure” that should there be another referendum in the next few years, the economic question would again be pushed to the front.
However, he said the arguments used by the Unionist camp in their 2014 campaign would be presented as having “even more weight” now because Britain is in so much collective debt as a result of the pandemic that Scotland could not afford to be independent.
“The UK is in infinitely more collective debt in 2021 than it was in 2014, so if people believed that argument or accepted it then, it’s going to be more convincing to them now.
READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: With Nicola Sturgeon on the world stage, time is right to launch indyref2
“It’s public knowledge that the impact of the coronavirus pandemic – having to fund the health service adequately to combat it, the furlough scheme, bounce-back business loans and various things – this whole process has cost the UK a lot of money and that is what a lot of people are aware of.
“So it means that should there be another referendum, that very simple but frightening message of ‘Scotland simply can’t afford independence because of recent history’ will be used as an argument.
“I can almost guarantee that will be a dominant narrative factor.
They’ll link Scotland’s poor economic prospects to the coronavirus pandemic.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel