CANADIAN academic Jordan Peterson has found himself at the centre of controversy after his appearance on the BBC’s Question Time show.
The outrage focused on a discussion around the experiences of racism described to MPs by former Yorkshire cricketer Azeem Rafiq.
When talking about the issue on the BBC, Peterson twice used “air quotes” around the word “racism” - a choice questioned by SNP MP Stephen Flynn.
Peterson said: “‘Racism’ is a global and vague term.”
READ MORE: Stamp out racism in cricket following Yorkshire shame, Jacob Rees-Mogg says
He was then interrupted by Flynn, who asked what he’d meant by the use of the air quotes around the term racism.
“Why would you possibly do that? What did that mean?” Flynn asked, adding: “The inverted commas as if it’s not a real thing?”
Peterson answered: “That isn’t what it meant. It meant that it’s indicative of low-resolution thinking.”
I promise you, *nothing* can prepare you for Jordan Peterson on Azeem Rafiq #bbcqt pic.twitter.com/FIuQnW7S8r
— William Kedjanyi (@KeejayOV3) November 18, 2021
The Ontario-based Youtuber and professor said he was not denying the experience described by Rafiq, but argued that the conversation around racism should not go further than holding “those specific people … specifically to account for their actions”.
He said he did not believe discussions around structural or institutional racism were “helpful”.
Rafiq had said he experienced racism and the “institution is the problem”, but Peterson said he did not believe that speaking in such terms does any good, instead claiming it exacerbates the problem.
Peterson claimed talking about structural racism does not address the real issue, adding: “That does not mean ‘racism’ doesn’t exist”, again using air quotes around the word for which he was again called out.
Nazir Afzal, a solicitor and former Chief Crown Prosecutor, then described a “rigged system based on privilege”.
He pointed to the disparity between the number of grassroots players of cricket from a south Asian background, against the number who make it to the England team. He also pointed to the number of current England players with family members who previously played for the team.
“That’s not a meritocracy”, he said.
“Brown people, black people, people from minorities are tired of having to describe how much racism we experience on a daily basis.”@nazirafzal says there’s a “rigged system based on privilege” at play in British sport. #bbcqt pic.twitter.com/NCwDFCyVbJ
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) November 18, 2021
Peterson’s contributions to the racism debate have been called out on social media, with some questioning why the BBC had platformed a man known for having controversial views.
Many users on Twitter labelled him a “pseudo-intellectual” using false arguments and abstraction to deflect from the real issue of racism.
English comic Eshaan Akbar said the discussion had been “absolute chaos”, highlighting how “5 out of 6 of this panel are white”.
Bella Caledonia wrote: “Giving a platform to this man was a deplorable editorial decision @bbcquestiontime.”
Giving a platform to this man was a deplorable editorial decision @bbcquestiontime https://t.co/clddQo22Pd
— Bella Caledonia (@bellacaledonia) November 19, 2021
Peterson has previously claimed that order is masculine and chaos feminine, and suggested that there is not a “patriarchy” but instead a hierarchy “predicated on competence”.
He has also said that the right-wing extremism which manifests in “incel” culture and terror attacks, such as the mass shooting in Plymouth this year, could be ended with “enforced monogamy”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel