THE Culture Secretary has come under renewed fire on social media after it emerged that she had reshared a post labelling a journalist an “Islamist apologist” and calling for them to be fired.
Nadine Dorries shared a Twitter post aimed at LBC radio host James O’Brien, which it called a “bully”.
The full post read: “I believe James O’Brien of LBC fame is a hate preacher, a liar, a misogynist, a UK hater and an apologist for Islamist atrocities.
“I also believe he is a bully who hides behind the Global/LBC name who condone his behaviour.
“I also believe he should be sacked. Plz R/T [please retweet] if you agree.”
At around 1:30 in the morning on March 23, 2018, a year before she was elevated from the Tory backbenches, Dorries reshared the post on Twitter.
READ MORE: Tory Culture Secretary under fire for publicly censuring Laura Kuenssberg
It was swiftly deleted but caught by the website Politwoops, which records tweets removed by politicians.
It is not the first time Dorries has been found sharing hatred on social media, despite claiming in a BBC interview published today (November 19) that left-wing activists have “hijacked” the online platforms and people should “tone down the condemnation and the judgment”.
Her retweet of the post calling for O'Brien to be fired comes despite warning in that BBC interview about people being afraid to speak their mind amid fear of being "cancelled".
She was previously quizzed at a Westminster committee meeting about tweets she had sent calling O’Brien a “f***wit”.
Highlighting the deleted retweet from Dorries, O’Brien wrote on Twitter that he was “shocked” by the language used.
Bloody hell. Even I’m shocked. Nadine Dorries did this to me. Deleted very quickly but how could any vaguely respectable politician have retweeted this unhinged bile about anyone? Let alone a politician now complaining about online abuse? https://t.co/rzEuTIOtZZ
— James Oh Brien (@mrjamesob) November 19, 2021
He wrote: “Bloody hell. Even I’m shocked.
“Nadine Dorries did this to me. Deleted very quickly but how could any vaguely respectable politician have retweeted this unhinged bile about anyone? Let alone a politician now complaining about online abuse?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel