A SENIOR Tory MP who accused the Prime Minister’s father of inappropriately touching her has condemned a culture of “victim blaming and shaming”.
Caroline Nokes, chairwoman of the Commons Women and Equalities Committee, accused Stanley Johnson of forcefully smacking her on the backside while they were both candidates for the party.
Speaking to Times Radio on Sunday, she revealed that journalists have scoured through her past sex life to “find some sort of defence”.
Stanley Johnson has said he had no recollection of Nokes or the allegations, which the MP said happened at the Conservative Party conference in 2003.
Her allegation prompted Ailbhe Rea, a journalist for the New Statesman, to allege that Stanley Johnson “groped” her at the Tory conference in 2019.
Stanley Johnson also groped me at a party at Conservative conference in 2019.
— Ailbhe Rea (@PronouncedAlva) November 15, 2021
I am grateful to Caroline Nokes for calling out something that none of us should have to put up with, not least from the Prime Minister's father. https://t.co/Uf6lEdatux
But Nokes said since her revelations, as part of a panel on Sky News, some had come to the “warped” view that she was “the sort of woman it’s okay to sexually harass”.
She told Times Radio that after the incident she “like so many women had that response of well, how will this impact upon me? How will talking about this have a negative impact on me? And even 18 years later, you can see people trying to turn it back on me, victim-blaming and shaming”.
Nokes said: “Now, look, I don’t regard myself as a victim. I won’t be a victim.
“But to read some of the things that have been said about me and you think well, OK, so clearly some people, some sections of the media, have decided that I’m the sort of woman it’s OK to sexually harass.”
READ MORE: Tories urged to investigate Stanley Johnson over inappropriate touching claims
She continued: “I’ve seen a number of journalists try to trawl my past sex life as some sort of defence for someone doing that.
“We are literally in a culture that is trying to turn it on the woman, make it her fault, blame her, accusing her of making it a political vendetta”.
Nokes said she had heard from women in all walks of life about the harassment they were subject to. She said there was “a particular problem in politics where in too many cases you have older men in positions of power and influence over younger women”.
Nokes said the Conservative chief whip had been “very supportive and very helpful” over the allegations, but that Stanley Johnson had not apologised. “I think we all know he doesn’t know who I am,” she explained.
She stated it was for the party to decide whether to launch a formal investigation into Stanley Johnson, but that she still would not know where to report the allegations if they happened today.
She said: “Well, look, if anyone had said to me in 2003 that I should report it I think my first question would have been to whom? How? What processes are there for me to make a complaint to the Conservative Party about a fellow candidate?
“And I just didn’t know that there were any and I think I would probably struggle to identify who to complain to now to be brutally honest.”
But she urged other women to come forward with their experiences.
She said: “I know how hard it is when you’re at the start of your career to speak out publicly against somebody who can perhaps impact that career.
“But it’s not just female MPs, it’s Spads (special advisers), civil servants, women working in the media, and there’s the stark reality.
“I don’t think that Westminster is any worse in terms of MPs than you perhaps see in the political lobby. I think there are real problems there as well.
“And I really do think it’s incumbent upon all of us to work together to call it out and to make sure that men who are behaving in this way understand that it’s inappropriate.”
On Thursday, the Prime Minister refused to say whether the Conservatives would launch an investigation.
He told reporters: “First of all, it’s absolutely right that everybody, women in particular, should be able, should have the confidence, to come forward and make complaints.
“There are proper procedures available for people to make their complaints, to make known what has happened and for those to be properly investigated.
“But I’m obviously not going to comment on individual cases.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel