THE royal households have issued a joint statement criticising the BBC for giving credibility to “overblown and unfounded claims” in a documentary aired on Monday night.
The first episode of the two-part The Princes And The Press programme, presented by Amol Rajan, explored the relationship of the Earl of Strathearn and the Earl of Dumbarton with the media, including suggestions of royal sources briefing journalists behind the scenes.
In a statement given to the BBC, and shown at the end of the programme, Buckingham Palace, Clarence House and Kensington Palace said: “A free, responsible and open press is of vital importance to a healthy democracy.
“However, too often it is overblown and unfounded claims from unnamed sources that are presented as facts and it is disappointing when anyone, including the BBC, gives them credibility.”
READ MORE: Stuart Cosgrove: When it comes to the royal family, Scotland is likely to compromise
During the programme, a lawyer for the Countess of Dumbarton also responded to reports in 2018 about Meghan’s alleged treatment of palace staff.
In March, The Times newspaper reported that the duchess allegedly drove out two personal assistants and “humiliated” staff on several occasions, which she denies.
An investigation has since been launched by Buckingham Palace and the royal household has tasked an external legal team to assist its human resources team looking at allegations made against the former Suits star.
Jenny Afia, from the law firm Schillings, told Rajan on the programme: “Those stories were false. This narrative that no one can work for the Duchess of Sussex, she was too difficult and demanding as a boss and everyone had to leave, it’s just not true.”
Following the airing of the programme, a report published in The Sun claimed that William banned aides from briefing against family members.
According to the newspaper, the duke was “clear” he did not want aides to say anything about the other households after he saw reports during the split of his parents.
In the programme, a private investigator apologised for targeting the phone of a former girlfriend of Harry and admitted he helped “rob” him of his teenage years.
READ MORE: Queen branded 'climate change hypocrite' after COP26 intervention
Gavin Burrows told the BBC there had been a “ruthless” culture in parts of the media in the early 2000s, when he said Chelsy Davy’s phone had been under surveillance.
He told the documentary there was a much greater interest in Harry than his brother when he began working for the now defunct News of the World in 2000.
He added there was a “ruthless” culture in the media, saying: “They’ve got no morals – they absolutely have got no morals.”
Burrows went on to say: “I was basically part of a group of people who robbed him (Harry) of his normal teenage years.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel