THE Scottish Greens are demanding that Holyrood is handed powers over immigration after condemning the “institutional malice and cruelty” of the Home Office.
It follows revelations that asylum seekers arriving in England after crossing the Channel have been transported 500 miles by bus to be processed in Scotland.
Until recently, asylum seekers – often suffering physically and mentally from an extremely dangerous crossings in flimsy boats – were sent to Home Office short-term holding facilities in southern England.
But the Guardian reports that some arrivals are now being forced to undertake an eight to nine-hour bus journey to Dungavel detention centre in Strathaven, South Lanarkshire.
Scottish Detainee Visitors director Kate Alexander told the paper: “When I visited Dungavel on 14 October, I learned that around 50 people who had crossed the Channel in small boats had been brought there for ‘processing’. Staff said this was the second time it had happened in a month, but not before that.
“I was profoundly shocked that the Home Office is putting people traumatised from a dangerous Channel crossing on a bus journey of over 500 miles immediately on arrival.”
Responding to the report – and Priti Patel’s vows to take tougher action on people crossing the Channel – the Greens said the Home Office’s “disgraceful” conduct shows Holyrood should be in charge of immigration in Scotland.
Scottish Greens immigration spokesperson Ross Greer said: "Many of the people who have crossed the Channel have fled war, poverty, violence and persecution. They deserve our support, empathy and solidarity, not the disgraceful hostility and scapegoating we have seen from the Home Office. The last thing they need is to be put on a 500 mile bus journey and detained in somewhere as inhumane and brutal as Dungavel.
"The Home Office has shown time and again that it cannot be trusted to ensure the welfare of refugees. It has a long and shameful record of institutional malice and cruelty. The same goes for the Tories, who established the policy of making Britain a 'hostile environment' for immigrants and presided over the Windrush scandal.”
He added: "With independence we can build a fairer, greener and inclusive Scotland that extends a hand of friendship, rather than a UK which detains refugees in prison-like conditions and sends vans into our communities to remove residents in dawn raids. We can take a different path and introduce a humanitarian and welcoming immigration policy that reflects the better society and economy we want to build."
Patel and the UK Government are currently trying to pass the anti-migrant Nationality and Borders Bill, which campaigners say will lead to the criminalisation of asylum seekers.
A Home Office spokesperson told the Guardian: “The British public have had enough of seeing people die in the Channel while ruthless criminal gangs profit from their misery and our new plan for immigration will fix the broken system which encourages migrants to make this lethal journey. People should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach – rather than making dangerous journeys to the UK.
“That is why we will have rules in place to make asylum claims inadmissible where people have travelled through or have a connection to safe countries.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel