FILMMAKER Ken Loach has launched a new attack on Labour leader Keir Starmer, branding him “treacherous and dishonest”.
The 85-year-old socialist, who was expelled from the party earlier this year because he refused to “disown those already expelled”, heavily criticised Labour’s current direction in an interview with Greek daily newspaper Ta Nea.
The I, Daniel Blake filmmaker had been a member of Labour since the 1960s – leaving for a period under Tony Blair’s leadership – but said being kicked out now made him feel “relieved”.
At the time of his expulsion, Labour said they would not comment on individual cases but added: “The NEC took the decision to proscribe a number of organisations at its last meeting.”
READ MORE: Campaign against Jeremy Corbyn damaged the Labour party beyond repair
“It is a badge of honour to be expelled by or to leave a party that has become a parody of a left party and now stands firmly with the interests of capital and business,” Loach told the Athens-based newspaper.
He referred to Starmer’s insistence this week that Labour is now the party of business – something which was previously said by former prime minister Tony Blair.
“Sometimes our party has come across as thinking that business is to be tolerated in some way but not to be celebrated as a good in itself,” Starmer said after Monday’s CBI conference. “That mindset has changed under my leadership and under [shadow chancellor] Rachel Reeves.”
Loach gave his verdict on that position. “[Labour are] now standing for the interests of business and that means they stand against the interests of the working class. So, it's like ending an abusive relationship; it’s a great relief,” he said.
READ MORE: Why there’s lesson for Scotland in Labour’s shameful expulsion of Loach
He was asked if Starmer could be described as a “sort of Blair in disguise”, to which he agreed but with caveats.
“Blair had a certain attractiveness,” Loach suggested. “He presented himself as this bright young man, you know, leading the way to a golden future. Starmer is a dull man. He’s tedious beyond words. He doesn't have the superficial attraction of Blair. He's dull, he's treacherous and dishonest.”
Speaking earlier this week, Starmer set out Labour’s stance on the Conservative government’s treatment of firms. He suggested his party opposes the level of tax faced by companies, suggesting this had “held back” some businesses.
“The reason we oppose the Government’s tax rises now is because business said us ‘as we come out of the pandemic and we are trying to get back on our feet, the last thing we need now is to be held back by tax’,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel