THE BBC has been criticised for its use of the word "migrants" in coverage of the English Channel tragedy.
At least 27 people, including pregnant women and children, died when a dinghy capsized off the coast of Calais on Wednesday.
According to The Times, one of the people who died in the tragedy was an Afghan man who’d worked with the British armed forces. It was reported that he and his family took the risk of travelling over the Channel as they had “waited for long for help” from the UK Government.
There was an outpouring of grief from campaigners and charities, who called for answers and urgent changes to current policies – while politicians said a solution needed to be found to tackle the crisis.
Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said people are being driven to seek refuge out of “desperation” and a “lack of humanitarian alternative routes”.
READ MORE: English Channel deaths: Nicola Sturgeon calls for action to prevent further tragedy
"We should be working together to ensure that those seeking refuge get protection from exploitation, not get punishment or criminalisation,” she told Holyrood.
“They need rescue, not diversion back into treacherous waters."
The First Minister is understood to be referencing the Home Secretary’s plan to make crossing the Channel illegal without permission, and have border staff force boats back into French waters. There are legal concerns over whether this would be a possible strategy.
Rosella Pagliuchi-Lor, UK representative for UN refugee agency UNHCR, said: “There is an obligation to both save lives at sea and not endanger lives at sea, which would almost unavoidably happen if there were attempts at turning back dinghies which are overcrowded with people.”
Home Secretary Priti Patel said the drownings were a “dreadful shock” and described the crossings as “absolutely unnecessary” after renewing an offer of sending British officers to join patrols on French beaches during a call with French interior minister Gerald Darmanin. French President Emmanuel Macron said he was requesting “extra help” from the UK.
Brendan O’Hara, the MP for Argyll and Bute, called the deaths in the Channel an “unspeakable tragedy” - and hit out at the media reports of the incident.
He said: “Last night I tuned in to the BBC 10 o’clock news to get the latest on this terrible disaster and I was absolutely appalled when a presenter informed me that around 30 migrants had drowned. Migrants don’t drown. People drown. Men, women and children drown.
“So will the Secretary of State join me in asking the BBC News editorial team and any other news outlet thinking of using that term to reflect on their use of such dehumanising language and afford these poor people the respect that they deserve.”
READ MORE: UK Government's 'racist anti-refugee bill could start race to the bottom’
Priti Patel said: “Even during the Afghan operations and Op Pitting I heard a lot of language that quite frankly seemed to be inappropriate around people who were fleeing.
“So yes, I will.”
A spokesperson for the BBC said: “We always think carefully about the language we use and in this report we have made very clear the human cost of this tragedy. It is not always obvious whether those making these crossings already have refugee status, are seeking asylum, looking for work, the stage of their journey, or whether they will try to enter a country illegally. We judge each story on a case by case basis.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel