NICOLA Sturgeon has rejected criticism from Alex Salmond about her objections to new oil fields in Scotland, saying her stance doesn’t throw those in the sector “on the scrap heap”.
The First Minister was grilled by the BBC’s Glenn Campbell, who asked her about the Cambo oil field and her record on climate change.
Salmond last week said that Sturgeon’s opposition to Cambo is a blow to the case for Scottish independence.
“That doesn’t mean we throw the people who currently work in the oil and gas industry on the scrap heap”@NicolaSturgeon rejects criticism from @AlexSalmond and others of her objections to new oil and gas fields, like #Cambo pic.twitter.com/zunEep7xDy
— Glenn Campbell (@GlennBBC) November 27, 2021
Comparing the position to Thatcher’s abandonment of coal mining communities in the 1980s, he went on to say that it will cost the SNP thousands of votes in the north east.
READ MORE: Scots Tories told to stop 'sitting on their hands' over carbon capture snub
The Alba Party leader wrote in the Sunday Mail: “For 50 years, the clarion call of ‘It’s Scotland’s oil’ has fired the engine of Scottish independence.
“Last week Nicola Sturgeon turned off the switch in a response to a parliamentary taunt from a Labour MSP.
“She came out against the development of the massive new Cambo oil field. The consequences could be far-reaching and not just for the SNP but for the whole independence movement.”
Sturgeon has urged the UK Government to not confirm the Cambo proposals until a climate assessment has taken place.
She said that an approach that puts the climate first does not have to mean throwing those in the oil and gas industry on the scrap heap.
Sturgeon said: “At the moment, Cambo effectively will get the green light without a climate assessment.
“I don't think that is right in the circumstances we are in. Therefore, what I've said to Boris Johnson, whose decision that says is subjected to a rigorous climate assessment.
“Now, I don't think having said that, you can completely prejudge that. But many people, and I've got a lot of sympathy with this, would say in the face of the climate emergency with the scientists saying what they're saying about fossil fuels, could it ever pass that rigorous climate assessment? So it shouldn't get the green light because we are in that situation.
“But there's also been a lot of misrepresentation of my position. Look, look, stop trying to misrepresent my position. We've got to accelerate away from fossil fuels.
“That is inescapable and anybody who tries to suggest otherwise is putting their head in the sand. Well, if it doesn't get the point, great, but that doesn't mean that we throw the people who currently work in the oil and gas industry on the scrap heap.”
Campbell interjected to say that Salmond considered Sturgeon’s position to be a “backwards step” for jobs and for SNP votes.
Responding, the First Minister said: “I think that is just an oversimplified analysis of the position, you can't magic away the climate emergency and anybody who tries to do that is not being fair to this or to future generations.”
READ MORE: Green Labour ambitions called out after leader meets with oil and gas body
Campbell interrupted again to ask if Sturgeon is a recent convert to the climate emergency. “This is the same Nicola Sturgeon who went to Shetland in 2014 and predicted a second oil boom,” he said.
Sturgeon replied: “If you look at the science, what the science is telling us now, from 2014 to now, it is very different.”
Campbell cut in to ask: “Is this the same Nicola Sturgeon who in 2017, went to an oil conference, and reassured them that you would remain committed to maximum economic value being extracted from the North Sea?”
Sturgeon replied, “Yeah, it's the same Nicola Sturgeon who has learned as the science has developed, and who is saying, ‘well, the things that all of us thought were possible in 2014 or 2017, we can no longer hold to these things’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel