ANYONE who has spoken out to criticise Boris Johnson’s policies has been banned from speaking at internal events in Whitehall, according to reports.
The Telegraph has reported on an email sent to government staff and marked “official-sensitive” which warned civil servants about inviting anyone who had “spoken against key government policies”.
The paper also reported that “woke” speakers had been banned, but this word does not seem to have appeared in the government communique.
Under the pretence of retaining “impartiality”, the email, reportedly sent by a senior Cabinet official, tells staff to carry out background checks to ensure speakers have not criticised the Tories.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford set to step up attack on ‘failing’ Boris Johnson
It read: “We recognise that it is not always clear to determine whether an activity is deemed political or if an individual has spoken against key government policies.
“This is why all cross-government networks must carry out due diligence checks on all speakers invited to events, and the content of any events and communications to ensure impartiality.
“Networks and their members must complete such checks to avoid any invitations being issued to individuals and/or organisations that have provided commentary on government policy, political decisions, approaches or individuals in government that could be deemed political.”
It says that such criticism may have appeared on social media or elsewhere.
Commenting on the news, Good Law Project director Jolyon Maugham (below) wrote: “What this note seems say is if you have criticised government policy you can't be invited to speak to civil servants. In other words, only those who haven't criticised government policy get invited.
“And this - which is inimical to neutrality - is presented as retaining it.
“It's the conduct of a Government fearful of challenge, that responds to it by trying to silence the speaker rather than meeting the challenge, and that wields the power of State patronage to punish those who speak against the Government.”
He later added: “I remember being asked to address HMRC's counter-avoidance unit on tackling tax avoidance, something I was advising both Labour and the Conservative Party on. But I would now be banned from speaking.”
Others drew comparisons between the UK Government’s actions and the “cancel culture” condemned by top Tories such as Nadine Dorries.
A Cabinet Office spokesperson told The Telegraph: “Employees are encouraged to engage and discuss a range of different topics and perspectives, and all events must be consistent with the civil service code of conduct. We have reminded departments and staff networks of these expectations for events.
“We have recently adopted an increased due diligence process for guest speakers in line with cross-government best practice.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel